Moving cables around killed dynamics for days anyone else experience this?

alexberger

... 99% of audiophiles who try to use these kind of theories don’t have any of required knowledge.

To what "theories" do you refer? What knowledge is "required?"

Given your insistence on applying science, I have to ask: How did you arrive at your "99%" calculation?

And given your distaste for audiophile "morons" and "fanatics," will you please tell us what you hope your claims will accomplish here?

Because every second person on any audio forum likes to talk about science and measurements.
But how many people here have any education in electronics, physics and psychoanalytic?
Most of they didn’t study out of these disciplines.
Unlike most of people here, I have BSc in electronics. But I don’t have enough knowledge to enplane most process in audio scientifically.

Calling these characters "audiophile morons" is totally wrong.

The correct term is #measurementmorons (LOL!!)

Because every second person on any audio forum likes to talk about science and measurements.

It's been my experience that those who hear a difference don't usually cite scientific findings to explain what they hear as they trust their ears.
Once the topic of "science' is breached, then, of course, it will be discussed.

But how many people here have any education in electronics, physics and psychoanalytic?

Lots. Some here are highly steeped in the sciences you mention and some haven't bothered participating in a long time due to the acrimony imparted by those who refuse to accept that one needn't need a degree in order to sense something accurately.

Most of they didn’t study out of these disciplines.
Unlike most of people here, I have BSc in electronics. But I don’t have enough knowledge to enplane most process in audio scientifically

That could be true re: most. Having that degree and admitting that you can't explain some of it scientifically is a step in the right direction, though. It's what we who don't have degrees do.

All the best,
Nonoise

It's been my experience that those who hear a difference don't usually cite scientific findings to explain what they hear as they trust their ears.

Bingo!

That's why science exists in the first place, to explain human experience. Human experience does not exist to explain science. The people who think otherwise have it exactly backwards. They are deeply, deeply confused.