The solution was clean power - via power conditioners, power supplies and quality copper cabling.
That makes me happy to hear as I am about to embark on a journey to clean up the power going to my CD player. 😀
Does Digital Try Too Hard?
I used to have digital glare many years ago. Not even a hint of it now.Yeah, me too, when it was in it’s infancy yes it did have glare courtesy of the "brick wall filters", and bad analog stages jiter ect ect, but now it’s got more detail, separation, smoothness and dynamic range than even the best vinyl, even playing the older CD’s, which btw have so much less compression than today’s reissues and remasters. These new reissues/remasters are relentless and can wear you down, everything’s the same volume level there’s no breathing space in between notes, that’s probably what the OP is hearing. And those ones are the compressed ones you get on Tidal, Spotify ect ect ect Just look at the compression in the later reissue/remaster versions of Sade’s Diamond Life. http://dr.loudness-war.info/album/list?artist=Sade&album=Diamond+Life Green is uncompressed red orange yellow is very compressed. Cheers George |
Post removed |
No, digital doesn’t try too hard. It has distortions which are new to audio playback. In the early days the designers didn’t even know about jitter. I remember the cover announcement on Stereophile when jitter was finally determined to be a problem. These distortions and their sources will be discovered and eliminated. We’ve come a long way since early digital and I only see digital getting better. Some people think describing digital as analog like is the highest compliment they can give it. Those people are usually vinyl fans. I don’t have a problem with that. If anyone prefers vinyl to digital, that’s fine with me, and I want them to enjoy vinyl as much as they can. Vinyl has its own distortions, though, and in the not too distant future I think that digital will reach a point where it is generally considered the best sounding format, IMHO. |