Cartridge loading


Presently I am using a ZU/Denon DL103 mc cartridge with ZU Audio's highest tolerances.  I had this cartridge mounted on my VPI Prime and after going through all the various loading combinations, I settled on 200 ohms.  I was always satisfied with my choice of setting.  I no longer have the Prime and now use the Technics SL1200G turntable.  After having the same cartridge mounted and aligned by the dealer, I inserted it into my system and enjoyed the sound immensely, never touching the 200 ohm setting.

Yesterday I was listening to vinyl most of the day and for some reason I found the sound to be better than ever, mostly in the treble area.  The highs had shimmer when needed and I had played the same records many times before on the Prime and they never sounded as good as they did yesterday.  Just for the heck of it, I checked the cartridge loading and found it was now set at 1000 ohms.  As I said, when I put the Technics into the system, I never bothered changing the loading which was at 200 ohms as it was the same cartridge, just a different turntable.

I believe I know what happened, when I last used the tone controls on my McIntosh preamp, (you have to shuffle through a menu) I must have inadvertently put the cartridge loading at 1000 ohms.  It truly sounds fantastic, better than I ever thought possible.  The Bass is still very deep and taut, midrange is the same but the treble, oh my, so much better.  Now the million dollar question is why should it now sound better at 1000 ohms, when it sounded great before at 200 ohms?  Can the tonearm on the Technics have an effect on cartridge loading?  I always thought it was all dependent on the preamp, amp and speakers.  What am I missing here?  I am very curious to know.  The specs for my cartridge say greater than 50 ohms for loading.

Thanks
128x128stereo5
As I have mentioned many times, the input impedance cannot be zero. If it were, you would have no output at all because the signal would be connected directly to ground.

While it is true that no voltage can develop across 0Ω that doesn’t mean that the current that is generated cannot be amplified and then converted back to voltage. While I agree that in reality 0Ω is an impossibility, I am also not convinced it is a good target to shoot for from anything other than an academic perspective. Like everything else in audio, the truth rarely lies at the extremes and lives in the subtleties of the middle.
As I have mentioned many times, the input impedance cannot be zero.

@lewm So the designer Junji Kimura is lieing everywhere about 0Ω inpedance of his own 47 Labs 4712 Phonocube and slightly cheaper 4718 phonostage too, and every reviewer repeating it ? I just don’t understand why then everywhere the input impedance in his special circuit stated as ZERO if it’s 2-4 Ω ? What’s the goal to tell it’s 0 Ω if it’s higher, will it help to sell more units ?

I don't accuse anyone of lying, except a certain President of the USA on some occasions. But manufacturers are sometimes given to hyperbole in their advertising copy, and too, they are sometimes inclined to treat their potential customers as ignorant, such that they feel the need to exaggerate in order to make their point.  Like Intactaudio said, an "ideal" current-driven phono would in fact present a zero ohm input Z. So I would say maybe Mr Kimura is exaggerating.  I never did any research into the 47 Labs product, but I did read as much as I could find about several others, most of which are far more costly than the 47Labs, and some of which have been given rave reviews (e.g., Aqvox, BMC MCCI, etc), and none of those truly provides zero ohms input impedance, if you read the fine print.  But that doesn't lead me to believe they aren't excellent in SQ.  In fact, I think that when M Fremer reviewed the BMC MMCI, he indicated its input Z is about 4 ohms. The one I'm using I know for sure does not give zero ohms input Z, but the sound I get from the MC2000 is superb, and that is what counts. I've also used it with another LOMC (AT ART7) that has a 12 ohm internal R.  Since my unit's input Z is about 20 ohms, it is operating more like a current drive when I use it with the latter cartridge, and it sounds just as excellent.
Dear @lewm  : """  could excite a force that feeds back on the motion of the cantilever so as to dampen or impede it.   """

Could be but I doubt it that could " impede it ". What you said is not related to the loading resistor that's what atmasphere supports alonfg its effects/? ? ?.
Now a cartridge designer/manufacturer takes in count all the elctrical and mechanical scenarios where the cartridge plays its role and seems to me that everything is really claculated witgh " wide " limits for the different play role scenarios due that the cartridge needs/must will performs good in such different scenarios. I don't rthink that in a good top cartridge design we can find out " surprises ".

In theory and due that a LOMC cartridge has a very low inductance the impedance loading ( resistor ) just can't modified ( electrically. ) the cartridge behavior. Instead in the mechanical scenario/land several and different parameters affects and has effects on the cartridge quality performance levels.The " dull " sound that some one posted when the cartridge is loaded with 100 ohms in reality is not a " dull " sound and what happened is that with that kind of load ( tha's the one I use. ) the SPL goes a little ( tiny ) lower and our ears are extremely sensitive with SPL changes especially at HF  but the information is all there and even cleaner that at 47kohms.
I attested that effect with different phono stages in many audio systems including mine.

As time goes on what atmasphere said has lower and lower and les " credibility " especially with out evidence by his part and taking in count the many first hand experiences we have that showed that things are the other way around.
You or intactaudio and other gentlemans as me are not true rookies in analog audio, we know for sure many audio main and critical subjects and if some one or something is out of the normal behavior/experiences then I want to learn two things: first if I'm wrong with all what I learned about or second to confirm that what I learned is rigth. Tha's all.

So we have to wait for the atmasphere precise and specific answer. We will see.

R.


@lewm 

I don't accuse anyone of lying, except a certain President of the USA on some occasions.

Ohh, same here, but 100%


I never did any research into the 47 Labs product, but I did read as much as I could find about several others, most of which are far more costly than the 47Labs, and some of which have been given rave reviews (e.g., Aqvox, BMC MCCI, etc), and none of those truly provides zero ohms input impedance, if you read the fine print. But that doesn't lead me to believe they aren't excellent in SQ. In fact, I think that when M Fremer reviewed the BMC MMCI, he indicated its input Z is about 4 ohms. 

Maybe Kemura's circuit of the 47 Labs Phonocube is just a different design ? Very expensive unit with that power supply, luckily i bought used sample.