Cartridge loading


Presently I am using a ZU/Denon DL103 mc cartridge with ZU Audio's highest tolerances.  I had this cartridge mounted on my VPI Prime and after going through all the various loading combinations, I settled on 200 ohms.  I was always satisfied with my choice of setting.  I no longer have the Prime and now use the Technics SL1200G turntable.  After having the same cartridge mounted and aligned by the dealer, I inserted it into my system and enjoyed the sound immensely, never touching the 200 ohm setting.

Yesterday I was listening to vinyl most of the day and for some reason I found the sound to be better than ever, mostly in the treble area.  The highs had shimmer when needed and I had played the same records many times before on the Prime and they never sounded as good as they did yesterday.  Just for the heck of it, I checked the cartridge loading and found it was now set at 1000 ohms.  As I said, when I put the Technics into the system, I never bothered changing the loading which was at 200 ohms as it was the same cartridge, just a different turntable.

I believe I know what happened, when I last used the tone controls on my McIntosh preamp, (you have to shuffle through a menu) I must have inadvertently put the cartridge loading at 1000 ohms.  It truly sounds fantastic, better than I ever thought possible.  The Bass is still very deep and taut, midrange is the same but the treble, oh my, so much better.  Now the million dollar question is why should it now sound better at 1000 ohms, when it sounded great before at 200 ohms?  Can the tonearm on the Technics have an effect on cartridge loading?  I always thought it was all dependent on the preamp, amp and speakers.  What am I missing here?  I am very curious to know.  The specs for my cartridge say greater than 50 ohms for loading.

Thanks
128x128stereo5
I bought a BMC MCCI current injection phono stage 2 months ago and agree with your assessment . I just had a Lyra Claves De Capo repaired By Steve @  VAS  . Best vinyl playback in my system to date . 2 ohm & 0.25 mv  stunning 
Raul, Intactaudio made measurements of frequency response and IM distortion, I think. You are here reporting your subjective impression, which is fine, but there’s a big difference. 
Dear @lewm  :  Not subjective you are wrong. Here is the very first intact audio post in the thread when he shared the IAR PM findings on the loading subject:

"""  Being the Skeptic that I am I repeated his tests and confirmed his results..  """


R.
Raoul,

Yes...  I confirmed the results via measurement.  I did not put forth any listening impressions.

To be clear the stage that Lew M is using is not a current amp in the true definition of the term.  Its circa 20Ω input Z is multiples enough of his cartridge internal impedance that it acts as a traditional voltage amplification stage.
Dear @intactaudio  : Thank's for the clarification I understand it in diferent way.

At the end through measurements or listening tests seems to me that only you, PM, JC, Palmer and I " experienced " that loading subject and its effects, at least according with the facts I have on hand.

Sorry @lewm  you was rigth.

R.