Fidelity Research FR-54 Tonearm. ANTI-SKATE???

Success, first trial, tied a nut on fish line,

1.36g home made anti-skate weight (factory weight is 2.5g)

Shure V15VxMR down 1.52g (the weight my Grado ME+ Mono Cartridge wants 1.5g) 

Instant, no strained listening needed, 3 guitarist as finely imaged as I am used to.

Who knows what changes my slightly thicker fish line makes?

I will get some finer line, make a permanent dangling 1.35 weight. Perhaps I will make an intermediate 1.75 g weight while I have my tools out.

1.35; 1.75; 2.5 collection! Maybe I should get rich selling them.
...........................

It is my NON-SCIENTIFIC opinion that the weight, attached 1/2" forward of the center of the pivot, exerts a force slightly more than it’s own weight,

which is why I decided to start with 1.35g trial.

WHAT IS, IS

Color Me Happy!

Color my Grado’s Stylus Cantilever Still Happy years from now!
..................
I set Shure to track it's recommended 1.25g on the main stereo arm.

I think. The Jico SAS/Boron replacement stylus has a brush, (not damped like Shure).

Shure says when used, it's brush pushes up .5g, so set 1.75 for resultant 1.25g.

Jico, using it's brush, I am using 1.6g. Just an instinctive guess for a near 1.25 result.

 I would never challenge the result of your listening tests. I am happy that you have arrived at what appears to be a satisfactory amount of anti-skate. However, please don’t deny the laws of physics. No matter how many grams you put on the end of your string, the resulting AS force at the stylus tip will be much less, in grams. What you have really demonstrated is that the amount of AS needed is much less than the VTF, in grams. A few other people besides me mentioned that at the beginning of this thread. 

lewm,

thanks for all your input on this and other threads.

I've been joking about science, but hands on solved it.

my left channel on my tube amp just went silent, wish me luck.

stringreen5,510 posts01-24-2020 10:12pm

Fuggetaboutit
.....................

If you meant, just enjoy the music without worrying about it, which in many instances is a valid idea.

not so with LP cartridge, you gotta get it right, especially anti-skate.

..........................................

level tt.

protractor 4 measurements/alignment (pivot to spindle; overhang; two null points. fairly easy to get right).

azimuth is very important, I use a mirror, and check/re-check, am I sure many times, lock that headshell very tight, final check in case tightening moved it. do it again.

Vertical Tracking Angle, a bit tedious, especially if height of arm lift gets involved, but, achievable.

tracking force (anti-skate to zero) checked with a digital scale, easy.
..........................................

finally anti-skate.

Listening, balance, imaging, everything opening up as intended, all comes from proper anti-skate.

Wear and Tear is related to getting anti-skate right, get the stylus to float in the groove while playing, ready to be whipsawed and sea-sawed this way and that.

The forces are tremendous. The stylus hitting dust in a groove:: A Train, traveling 60 knots/70 mph, bashing into cattle, except the cattle are in a chute.

reduces groove wear; reduces uneven stylus wear; allows cantilever shaft to be/stay straight/balanced/moving it’s magnet or coil properly within the cartridge body

allows diamond to get deeper in the groove than if it is riding one side a bit.
..............................

Get this right, then FUGGETABOUTIT, enjoy the music.

oh yeah, double check tracking/anti-skate in a few months.

Unfortunately, the anti-skate force is never exactly right from one second to the next. So to some degree I share the notion: forget about it, unless you are hearing gross distortion in one channel or another, which you noted. And you did the right thing to correct that. NOW you can forget about it.