Resistors vs.peltz Autoformer- Differences


I just got an email from Zu.
They offer resistors for their speakers that will lower/raise impedance so that amps will have an easier time driving them.
What is the difference between using a resistor and using an Autoformer, like the Paul Speltz? Both seem to be doing the same thing.
Bob
gdnrbob
This cues a related question I've been mulling for quite some time.

Assuming the impedance increase added by the autoformer doesn't put the load outside of the amp's desired impedance range, what are the downsides of adding one?  

That is, why don't we just automatically bump up all of our speakers to around 16 ohms, and then remove the autoformer if a special case amp shows up that doesn't like that high of impedance (e.g., some of Nelson Pass's SIT amps generate more distortion at higher impedances and prefer the 4-8 ohm range)?

Thanks.
Hi Chris @cal3713 ,

I guess the most major downside of doing that would be that most solid state amps can’t provide much more than half as much power into 16 ohms as into 8 ohms.

And in the case of tube amps having 4 ohm and 8 ohm output taps I would expect that presenting the 8 ohm tap with a 16 ohm load would result in some degree of compromise to both maximum power capability and distortion performance.

Also, a less frequent concern may be that the increase in damping factor I referred to earlier (and the corresponding reduction in the output impedance presented to the speaker) may result in some speakers being overdamped, resulting in compromised bass performance and/or other adverse effects on tonal balance.  Of course, it's also possible that the increased damping factor/reduced output impedance could be beneficial in those respects in many cases, depending on the particular speaker and amp.

Best regards,
-- Al
@gdnrbob

Hi Bob,

Thanks for providing the link. Zero autoformers are normally used to increase the impedance seen by the amplifier, so I had assumed that your reference to using resistors as an alternative referred to inserting a resistor in series with the speaker, which would raise the impedance presented to the amp. But I see in the Zu writeups that what they are referring to is placing a resistor in parallel with the speaker, to **reduce** the high impedance some of their speakers would present to the amp.

A Zero autoformer can be connected "backwards" to accomplish the same reduction in the impedance seen by the amp, but the need to do that would only arise in uncommon situations. And in those situations I would expect that the large cost difference between the two approaches would make resistors the preferable alternative.

Best regards,
-- Al

Aside from the load impedance, wouldn’t adding a resistor in series with speaker driver affect the high frequency response of the driver, particularly in case of a single driver or a tweeter?