Morrow Audio re-design announcement: No more Ag coated Cu; Increased numbers of runs.

This thread is also IMO fantastic advertising for Morrow :-) certainly on my radar, now....

I owned the Morrow M1 cable and it was so good I upgrade to the M3 interconnect...

But I want to say that upgrading an audio system with a change of cables is in my mind the last upgrade to consider, way after the implementation of the audio system in controlled mechanical environment(vibrations-resonance), in an acoustically treated room, and in a cleaned electrical house grid...After that the changes of cable will have meaning and audible effects...Without these tweaking of these 3 embeddings, you will be with the cohort of deaf people, or with those people with a dead audio ( a non-treated one), that does not hears any differences between cables...Easy to understand why... :)

Ill stick to Purist all copper they sound wonderful.Purist is a great co as well.

Earlier in this thread I was somewhat disenchanted with what Morrow had done to their cable formula.  Since then I found that something was wrong with my aforementioned Audioquest Sydney IC's, and switched back to an all Morrow cable loom(except for power cables) and let it burn in for a while, as Morrows take a while to adjust.

Anyway, I had to admit that the sound was really really transparent with airy highs and depth.  Mind you, I'd upgraded at the pre since my previous post.  The Morrow ic's are 2 MA5 and 1 MA3, all old silver design.

I decided to upgrade the MA3, and just received the MA4 IC.  It needs some serious burn in first, so I'll update the thread in about a month.  I plan to cut the MA3 in half, and resolder to get double the conductors.

Just curious, how does Morrow Cables feel about wire directionality and cryogenics? By the way, the US Navy uses silver coated Teflon copper wire for most of its sensitive communications equipment. Are they missing something?