Best cartridge for very old worn vinyl

You can’t adjust overhang on cartridges like SPU or FR7 series, because they are headshell integrated (as one piece). The overhang is fixed by the manufacturer and you can;t altering the stylus position without altering PS of your arm. Pivot to Spindle distance is given by the tonearm manufacturer and it must be exactly as the manufacturer suggested (it’s in the manual for each tonearm). But Fidelity-Research is the manufacturer of both (tonearm and cartridge), when your PS is correct your stylus position is also spot on (and you don’t have to adjust anything else), but only for ONE alignment method chosed by the manufacturer. Ikeda designed his arm and his cartridges using Stevenson alignment (just like the majority of the Japanese manufacturers).

The difference between Stevenson and any other alignments is null points. Since the arm is not Linear Tracking there are only two ideal points across the record surface for your stylus, the rest is off.

When you will buy Linear Tracking tonearm the stylus is always spot on across the whole record.

For pivoted tonearms there are only two null points, and the difference between alignment methods is where they are on the record surface.

If you are using conventional cartridge and headshell with slots then you can re-align any cartridge for any geometry (Baerwald, Stevenson, Lofgren or whatever) without altering the PS, you will have to twist your cartridge in the headshell, overhand will be different too for different alignment methods.

Dear Howard,

With the SPU the distance from the collar (of the headshell) to the stylus tip is exactly 51mm. Ikeda clearly designed the FR7 with the SPU in mind and chose that same distance. This is why both these types are correctly aligned to Stevenson geometry when the arm is installed with the P2S specified by FR. Apparently your dealer installed the arm with the Dennesen protractor, which is preset for the Baerwald geometry. That alignment is preferred by ’experts’ and obviously there’s no problem if you have a ’normal’ cartridge that can be adjusted in the headshell. But these fixed headshell types can never correctly aligned in the FR using Baerwald.

Do follow chakster’s advise and get yourself the Feickert tool. If you look up the specified P2S distance of the FR66 and set the ruler of the Feickert at this distance you can figure out if the top plate of the arm pod allows a position that corresponds to that distance. If so, than your FR7 and SPU cartridges will be correctly aligned to Stevenson.

Of course choosing this setting will require repositioning your other cartridges to Stevenson as well. But using the Feickert tool that’s a walk in the park. The experts will advise against this change as they religiously follow Baerwald and dismiss Stevenson. You can judge for yourself: if they are correct the performance of the Koetsu should take a dive after its alignment has been changed from Baerwald to Stevenson. Conversily, by now correctly aligned the performance of your FR7 and SPU’s might improve considerably. Either way, this may prove to be an interesting experiment!

Keep us informed!

@Edgewear, many thanks !
I’ve figured out how to move the FR66 tonearm in the Balance, so I obviously couldn’t resist having a play around.
With the FR7fc in the arm I moved the arm pod around until the tip of the FR7 stylus  was lined up in the single “bullseye” on the Brinkman alignment tool. Previously the FR7 and SPU carts I own all sat a few millimetres short of this point, whereas all my non-fixed headshell carts had been adjusted to this alignment.
In other words the FR7 was now aligned the same as all my other non-fixed headshell carts (for the first time since I owned them).
To cut to the chase the improvement in sound quality was quite astonishing, way beyond any confirmation bias or other mystical bs to which I am prone.
What I still struggle to understand is why two cartridges, aligned identically, don’t obey the same laws of physics because they are made by different manufacturers. I appreciate that an SPU comes in a fixed headshell so you need to adjust the arm to align it, but once you have done so then it is no more or less aligned than a cartridge that can be aligned in the headshell itself (because it’s not a fixed design).
Without understanding the science one iota I do know that people debate which alignment method is best and I also appreciate that Ikeda seemingly used the Steveson alignment when designing the FR tonearms but does that mean that any cartridge mounted in an FR tonearm is misaligned unless it’s been set up to Steveson alignment ?
Again, I fully understand that ultimately one of these alignment “philosophies” might be better than the others, however isn’t that something that would then apply to all arms and all cartridges given that they are presumably based upon the laws of physics rather than something in the actual tonearms and cartridges themselves ?

Howard, can you measure the P2S distance of the new position you found for the tonearm? According to the FR66 manual the mounting (or P2S) distance should be set at 295mm. Only then will the FR7 be correctly aligned to Stevenson geometry.

You mention that the FR7 and SPU came several mm's short on hitting the 'bull eye' at the previous dealer's position. This seems to indicate that the P2S distance has become slightly shorter in the new position you found. Correct?

If you prefer to keep the arm mounted at this new P2S distance you will need to reposition all your other cartridges, otherwise they will now be misaligned. Basically it means all cartridges should have a headshell collar to stylus tip distance of 51mm, same as FR7 and SPU.

FR7fc has a conical tip and this tip profile is less sensitive to the adjustment, this is the one and only benefit of a conical tip :) When all other profiles are a bit off the alignment, it will be irrelevant for a conical tip.

If one of your FR7 has longer cantilever than others then one of them is probably not the original (but a re-cantilevered version). Because they are all designed for FR tonearms first and you know PS of the FR arms. When FR cartridge is off with correct PS on FR arm then it is a bad sign (the cartridge has fake cantilever). You’d better check everything again slowly to make sure.

When you align any cartridge with one point protractor then you have to alight the cantilever, not only stylus tip position. You can reach the point with your stylus, but a cantilever and the hole cartridge will be certain degree off the lines. If you will change PS distance to reach the required point with the stylus then you will notice another problem soon, the problem is that a cartridge position (and cantilever position) is not parallel to the lines on protractor. You can fix it only with conventional cartridge on conventional headshell with slots.