Thiel Owners


Guys-

I just scored a sweet pair of CS 2.4SE loudspeakers. Anyone else currently or previously owned this model?
Owners of the CS 2.4 or CS 2.7 are free to chime in as well. Thiel are excellent w/ both tubed or solid-state gear!

Keep me posted & Happy Listening!
jafant
Our early amps included Phase Linear 400 and Threshold S500, which turned out to be non-representative, leading to an error of judgement.
I think the way Jim looked at it was that the tripling at 1kHz allowed for midrange transients beyond rated continuous power and that those peaks rarely coincide with bass transients, therefore the working headroom.

Error, or hindsight, or fudged specs, the EQ gave Thiel some notoriety in the amp department. I don't think Jim ever got the amp demand part right (from a market viewpoint). If his design loads maintained 4 ohms minimum, the speakers would be so much easier to drive and the voltage sensitivity and current demands would be in sweeter equilibrium. That's my layman's opinion from the user peanut gallery.
tomthiel
Thank You for your insight and recalling  Jim's approach in speaker design
as it pertained to SR. Very informative.
Happy Listening!
sdecker
Thank You for chiming in with your knowledge of slew rate as well.Very informative.
Happy Listening!
Question for the group:

What would you consider...whether it be a brand, model or speaker type...that would be most opposite of what Thiels are? IOW, the antithesis of Thiel.

Not trying to be inflammatory or anything like that, just something I have been wondering about as I read/watch more and more speaker reviews.

Tom: I have not yet been able to try tilting my 3.5’s back as my business trip away from home is lasting a second week, but will report back once I am able to.
Hope everyone’s doing well...

Arvin C
The opposite of Thiel - based on my memory dating back to the 1970's ... how about Cerwin Vega