2. speakers
  3. 1295234042

Harbeth shl5 upgrade over spendor s8e?

Hi,
I'm considering upgrading my system with harbeth shl5 speakers. I dont have an opportunity to audition them so would love feedback from those of you who had the chance the compare it with my current speakers, the spendor s8e.
First off, I love my spenders. Great for jazz, render vocals. They exhibit true musicality. But I recently upgraded my system with an lfd int amp - superb- and heard that it pairs really well with the harbeths. My listening mix is mostly classical ( mostly chamber music, cello,...), jazz, blues, world music, and only a bit of pop, rock. My current system consists of nas, sonos, w4s dac1 with supercaps, lfd ncse, spendor s8e.

Would the harbeth shl5 be an improvement or not?

Thanks!
mizuno
nolitan
865 posts
 
For many years i used to listen to the Spendors. Great speakers, but when i heard the Harbeths, the Spendors were sold...
There is quite a difference between the harbeths and the spendors.... once in awhile i do miss the spendors but the harbeths are something else.

Yes, S8 to SHL5 is a big upgrade in terms of neutrality, details, musicality and clarity!!
bgeofft-duplicate-0
174 posts
 
I've owned C7's and SHL5's. Most post here and elsewhere that SHL5 is better on many levers. My view is depends. My pen pals in Japan prefer C7's 2 to 1. Not only because there listening spaces tend to be smaller either. Alan Shaw has had quite a bit to say about this, scratching his head in amusement that C7's aren't favored just as much as the SHL5. I have my thoughts on the matter. Suffice to say in one respect most Americans like all things bigger. Hope not to invite sniping, that's not my intent. Both are wonderful broadcast monitors. Alan can explain the difference between a studio and broadcast monitor on his website if you have any interest. Cheers.
bgeofft-duplicate-0
174 posts
 
My previous post was full of errors in composition, not content (IMO). Sorry for not correcting before posting. Embarrassing.
More to discover