Mgottlieb,
I forgot to ask you what you thought of the multi-channel performance of the X01 (in SACD) vs the two channel SACD performance? My experience on the DV 50 with SACD is that the multi-channel performance was far behind that of the two channel.
It seems to have nothing to do with the engineering of the disc or the surround mix because when I flipped back and forth between the two on the fly the 2 channel just always sounded better. I'm sure part of the reason for this is the manual says the dac's on the front two channels are superior to those connected to the 5.1 rca's.
Do you find the same type of disparity on the X01? I am hoping they significantly improved the mulit-channel performance over the DV-50? Regarding DVD-A, did you ever pinpoint why you felt DVD-A on the UX1 (the new universal) sounded less spectacular than the DV-50?
AVGURU
I forgot to ask you what you thought of the multi-channel performance of the X01 (in SACD) vs the two channel SACD performance? My experience on the DV 50 with SACD is that the multi-channel performance was far behind that of the two channel.
It seems to have nothing to do with the engineering of the disc or the surround mix because when I flipped back and forth between the two on the fly the 2 channel just always sounded better. I'm sure part of the reason for this is the manual says the dac's on the front two channels are superior to those connected to the 5.1 rca's.
Do you find the same type of disparity on the X01? I am hoping they significantly improved the mulit-channel performance over the DV-50? Regarding DVD-A, did you ever pinpoint why you felt DVD-A on the UX1 (the new universal) sounded less spectacular than the DV-50?
AVGURU