For efficient speakers, how much difference does an amp really make?


I have ascend sierra RAAL tower speakers with 90-93db efficiency and 300W continuous power handling. I’m powering them with dual outlaw M2200 monoblock class AB/G amps rated at 200W into 8 ohms. It sounds good...but i can’t help but wondering if a different amp would provide greater clarity and low-end grunt.

I have been curious about an older adcom amp like the GFA-555 II or perhaps a parasound halo amp like the A23. 

To those who have had multiple amps in your setup, did you find significant sonic differences between amps, or is a subtle thing? I don’t want to start collecting amps, but I don’t want to deny myself the chance to improve my system further. Thoughts?
dtrandall
Current is king. An amp that is comfortable at 4 ohms and stable to 2 ohms will be able to drive those with authority. An amp that is stable at 4 ohms and nothing below will likely sound thin as volume increase. I had this problem in the past with an integrated that was 4 ohm stable but not really happy there and with a power amp.  
At the time I upgrade to a Rogue Hydra (100w class D and doubles output down to 2 ohms) and my speakers came to life.

Because I import Art Audio, I brought in a pair of $17K mono-blocks and not shockingly, they have plenty of current to handle my lower impedance speaker.  

many manufacturers put in a power supply that delivers a big number into 8 ohms but won’t be up to the task as impedance drops. 
At times you can find that Hydra in the $1500 to $1800 range.  A stereo 100 which will have 50w in triode, 100w in ultra-Linear would be another great choice for hybrid and tube gear.  
For Solid State, Musical Fidelity is a strong value and does well at 4 ohms.  If you can find a used M6 PRX, they are amazing.  A new one is $2300 I think.  The older ones were $3K.
My take - the more efficient the speaker, the more the balance shifts toward quality from quantity when it comes to amplifiers. 

For a given budget, any amp designer is going to have trade-offs between power and finesse. There are obviously going to be some designers/companies that are more creative/efficient, etc. but building a more powerful amp means higher voltage parts, bigger transformers and caps, bigger heatsinks, larger chassis, etc. which take budget away from higher quality components. 

In other words, high efficiency speakers do not, in the least, diminish the benefits of a high quality amplifier, but they do reduce the need for tons of power. If anything, a high efficiency speaker will expose the limits (noise floor, linearity, etc.) of your electronics much more readily than a low efficiency speaker. 

If you've got high efficiency speakers, take advantage of your lower power demands to get an amplifier with more refinement for the same budget.
High efficiency speakers done well is a good thing but good quality full range ones are big bulky and thereby relatively expensive and generally require a lot of room to breathe.  Not for everyone. 
No single approach can do it all best.  Hence the variety. 
Also, these days, high efficiency Class D amps are a game changer delivering more often for less and in a smaller easy to handle package that is practical for many.  

I can answer your question. I mean I can REALLY answer your question. The reason I can answer it is, I had those exact speakers, with the same amp, and did the same thing your about to do. I had a set of Ascend Acoustics Sierra Towers with Raal , matching center ( Horizon Raal) and Sierra 2 surrounds. I had a Outlaw 7500 5 channel amp @ 200 per. I updated to the ATI Signature 6005 series @ 300 per. At idle, there was no change,. But turned up, especially on music, the change was impressive. Deeper, fuller, punchier. I loved that system, but you know us guys, we can’t leave well enough alone. I now have twice that much power with Legacy’s I*V5 amp and their speakers. But I liked that Raal tweeter so much it had a lot to do with me picking Legacy’s .

And those speakers will come to life with a couple nice subs. I started out with a pair of 8 inch push pull designs by Miller Kreisel. Then stepped up to 12 inch. I don’t think I would have had even close to the sound that system produced without the help of the subs .

Yes a good powered sub or two set up well is a very effective way to address power needs. Power needs for flat extended bass increases exponentially as  frequency decreases which is why most good subs these days deliver 100s of watts often using Class D amplification. Plus use of a crossover that relieves the bass load on the mains usually results in better performance from those as well because now your main amp has to not work as hard as before trying to do it all. Best thing since Swiss cheese......