Break in time that extends to months or maybe even years!!


On another thread, we have a well known and well respected piece of gear ( and great sounding too, IME) that according to the member who is reviewing it, needs in excess of 1000 hours to fully break in!! 

While we have all heard of gear that needs immense amounts of 'break in' time to sound its best, usually gear that involves teflon caps, I question whether this very long break in time is the job for the consumer? Is it reasonable for a manufacturer of audio gear to expect the consumer to receive sub-par performance from his purchase for potentially several months ( years?) before the true sound of the gear in question can be enjoyed? Or, is it ( or should it be) perhaps the job of the manufacturer of this gear ( usually not low priced) to actually accomplish the 'break in' before releasing it from the factory? Thoughts...
128x128daveyf
It's a huge selling point in some circles to buy gear that is extremely demanding.  The speaker that requires megalithic amps to sound good. The amp that needs $10K power cables to bring out the best performance.

Yes, I've heard break in, and no, I've never heard anything take more than 4 days.
Dream on companies can not tie up resources to break in stuff.This is high end audio if you do not like this take up photography.
By inspection, since the Cable Cooker re-breaks in cables every so often, nothing ever completely breaks in or stays broken in. Make sense? 
@ebm  WOW, NICE REPLY...NOT.
If you don't like my thread, please feel free to ignore.