Break in time that extends to months or maybe even years!!


On another thread, we have a well known and well respected piece of gear ( and great sounding too, IME) that according to the member who is reviewing it, needs in excess of 1000 hours to fully break in!! 

While we have all heard of gear that needs immense amounts of 'break in' time to sound its best, usually gear that involves teflon caps, I question whether this very long break in time is the job for the consumer? Is it reasonable for a manufacturer of audio gear to expect the consumer to receive sub-par performance from his purchase for potentially several months ( years?) before the true sound of the gear in question can be enjoyed? Or, is it ( or should it be) perhaps the job of the manufacturer of this gear ( usually not low priced) to actually accomplish the 'break in' before releasing it from the factory? Thoughts...
128x128daveyf
@ebm  WOW, NICE REPLY...NOT.
If you don't like my thread, please feel free to ignore.
@geoffkait How often are you re-breaking in cables? I have never done that, IME once they are broken in..they seem to stay that way.

@guidocorona   Does what you state in your prior post apply to the piece of gear in question that you started another thread on?
I like Douglas Schroeder's claim. Re-enforces my idea of buying used.  
Well, I am a cheapo also, but don't tell anyone.