Break in time that extends to months or maybe even years!!


On another thread, we have a well known and well respected piece of gear ( and great sounding too, IME) that according to the member who is reviewing it, needs in excess of 1000 hours to fully break in!! 

While we have all heard of gear that needs immense amounts of 'break in' time to sound its best, usually gear that involves teflon caps, I question whether this very long break in time is the job for the consumer? Is it reasonable for a manufacturer of audio gear to expect the consumer to receive sub-par performance from his purchase for potentially several months ( years?) before the true sound of the gear in question can be enjoyed? Or, is it ( or should it be) perhaps the job of the manufacturer of this gear ( usually not low priced) to actually accomplish the 'break in' before releasing it from the factory? Thoughts...
128x128daveyf
So, can we put all those rumors of fancy Duelund capacitors taking 500 hours to break in to rest? By the way at the shows, at CES it would take every bit of three days and three nights before the system sounded like it was almost broken in. You know, for the rooms that believed in that sort of thing. 
Post removed 
Post removed 
according to the member who is reviewing it, needs in excess of 1000 hours to fully break in!!
That's actually long enough that if a tube unit, it might have had to have tubes replaced already (although that would be a short period for a tube).


This still strains credulity- I'm not buying it- I suspect something else is afoot.