Thiel Owners


Guys-

I just scored a sweet pair of CS 2.4SE loudspeakers. Anyone else currently or previously owned this model?
Owners of the CS 2.4 or CS 2.7 are free to chime in as well. Thiel are excellent w/ both tubed or solid-state gear!

Keep me posted & Happy Listening!
128x128jafant
@tomthiel 
I widened the gap to more like 6” until close to the amp. I will listen critically again before switching back to the “standard” configuration.

@andy2 
The SE version has an oversized backplate, so I didn’t have to drill the veneer and MDF. But I probably would have if I had the regular 2.4. Then again, much of what I did was probably not for the faint of heart. There was a time or two when I worried I was in over my head. All smiles now! In most ways, my modded 2.4s sound as or nearly as good as the be$t I’ve heard. 
@jafant 
I do have a few of the myrtle blocks but most of my blocks are random pieces. Charles Hansen used to advise people who balked at the myrtle price to pick up a Jenga set at a garage sale. Pretty much all of my gear is on some kind of block, even my speakers which is supposed to be a no-no. But that’s a compromise to protect the hand woven rug I inherited from my parents.
beetlemania
Much Thanks! I only have 3 of those blocks currently. I suspect a Triangle pattern under the gear?
Happy Listening!
Yes, @jafant. The protocol is three blocks under your DX-5 (and other electronics).
beetlemania
Thank You- I can see Jenga pieces fitting as well. Let me know which product(s) tested and works well.
Happy Listening!
beetle , Tom 
I have my wires taped to the sides of Cardas speaker wire blocks ,
which are 2" wide and then crossing in-between each spacing with them being seperated about  1/2" apart at the crossing .
I did this so they aren't parallel possiblity reducing the possibilty of becoming a radio antenna .

unsound
I read the posts from your link , very interesting ,
but then again the whole issue of 
cable designs are very complex with no rights or wrongs ,
just differences with the end result and our own listening preferences and of course how deep are our pockets .

The issue of frequency range and hearing is hard to explain in the audio world of listening , how much do the frequency ranges that we can't hear ( for me it's over 9,000hz and under 50hz ) affect the 
qualities of space, dimension , width , height , 3D imagery that we listen for but tecnically can not measure ? 


My reason to make my own cables was to try a theory about the Cardas design ( and because I couldn't afford to move up ) ,  
which sounds better ?  2 wires of 11.5awg together equaling 8.5awg
( Neutral Reference ) or 1 wire of 9.5awg with the outer layer of wires being 1.6 times thicker ( Cardas golden Ration )  than the layer beneath it. 
I feel ( hear )  the home made cables sounded better !
Raising  new questions , was it the increased size of the outer wire in the design ( since it is one awg smaller than before ) or was it because of seperating the positive/negative current flow ? or a combination of both?