Speaker crossover mod. Your advice?

Louk - The "s" in the first sentence of my post was simply meant to be plural, as in "my Focal ten twenty sevens." I had forgotten that Focal made a speaker designated 1027S. Sorry for the confusion.

In any case, I do indeed have the 1027be, and I can say that I don't have the same problem in the midrange that you are describing. I don't doubt what you are hearing, but I wonder if there's an issue elsewhere in the system. I have found that the 1027be is rather revealing of issues in upstream components.

Bryon

Hi Bryon,

before I got the 1027 BE I did have the Trent II from Castle, a wonderful sounding little loudspeaker combined with an Infinity subwoofer. Not that perfect as the Focal but not so far of it. For the price, absolute high value. If I compare the 1027 BE with the Trent II and with other loudspeaker, the midrange is to thin. Also my ear is missing some pressure in the mid (voices and some instruments). Clearly it may also be a matter of taste, but I don't beleave, that it is only that. Maybe they changed something in the series. Which midrange chassis is built in your BE (my is as stated 6 W 4361)? The serial number of my BE is 10A 000 115, but there is nowhere a date of production.
One point but very unlikely could be, that the mid chassis has a lost of efficiency. Electrically I could not find a problem. I did wobble the voltage at the mid with a tone generator and checked the wave with an oscilloscope. Below 2kHz it gets a maximum of 80% amplitude of the crossover input. The impedance of the mid is 7 Ohm, I expected 8 Ohm, but I have to verify that with a better multimeter.

louk

Louk - The serial number is 10E005493.

Which midrange chassis is built in your BE (my is as stated 6 W 4361)?

By "midrange chassis," do you mean the midrange driver? If so, I'm not sure what its designation is. I looked at the back of the driver and the information was so faint that it was unreadable. Here is a photo of the midrange driver:

midrange driver.

bc

Hi Bryon,

yes, midrange driver. Here is a photo of mine: http://img855.imageshack.us/img855/4416/mid6w4361back1.jpg.
If you like, you may look on the second mid driver, whether the label is there better readable.
I would assume, that your 1027 BE was later produced an may have been improved a bit. On the crossover C1 changed from 3.9uF to 3.6 on your board.

louk

The other midrange was too faint to read as well. Judging from your picture of the rear of your driver, I'd say our midrange drivers are the same. So I don't know what to attribute the difference to.

bc