Soundsmith having Issues because of COVID

noromance, I stated my assumption that neither Peter nor Van den
Hul do those repairs or retips by them self. Both have some or many
employees. I can't understand that  some persons have difficulty 
to understand this assumption. Despite the fact that English is not
my native language or that this assumption is incomprehensible.
The simple negation of  my assumptions  with arguments would
be sufficient. But I have seen no arguments at all. Instead  there
are the so called ''straw man arguments''. My statement was not
clear (aka ''understandable'') . I ''failed in my initial comment'', my
English is not ''native'' while I also accused without cause the
incriminated persons. My assumption now is that despite your
''native language'' you are not able to understand an simple
English sentence. 
  

(addendum) Names and identity. Names assume some bearer
of the name. Names have no meaning but only refer. Knowing
an name does not mean to know anything about the person.
That why names are called ''not  predicative'' . 
Now what does the statement ''Peter has retiped my cart'' or
''Van den Hul has repaired  my cart mean? They obviously don't
mean that someone else deed this work because we would then
say Herman deed or simple '' I have no idea who fixed my cart''. 
Is this so difficult to grasp?

I for one will be glad if Peter is the skipper, and others are sailing the ship. So many legendary Japanese cart artisans have retired or died, and taken their secrets w them...if Peter has trained successors to carry the flame, thank the Lord. I never wanna have to consider another brand.

@nandric

Interesting that you chose to ignore the point that your behavior is rude. Also that your point that you bring up has no relevance to the PURPOSE of this thread. Rather that you choose to denigrate a company that others value.

Kick a good company and man while they are down. That is how you do things? Valuable insight into your character I would say.