Of course one could listen to a system and drop dead in awe but to attribute that solely to the tweaks would still require a huge leap of faith. Other systems with out similar tweaks could still even deliver a more fatal blow possibly even for less. One should avoid jumping to unsubstantiated conclusions. |
mapman ... If you heard my system, you’d think that you had walked into an old-time Billy Graham revival tent. You’d be a convert in no time at all. Repent, anti-tweakers ... Repent! *lol* Frank |
For the record of course as OP well knows, I am not an “anti tweaker”. I’ve done quite a few of my own. Some work really well some not so much and everything in-between. I treat each case individually based on the specific merits and of course anything that helps tie a specific result to a specific part of the system. Life is basically just a bunch of tweaks. But in any case the fact stands that it’s the whole system that produces the end result. There can be things in there that do nothing different or special which just means the system sounds as good or bad as it would have otherwise. It can’t help anyone’s case to claim otherwise and attribute the end result solely to whichever part happens to strike one’s fancy for whatever reason at any particular time. |
