With one set of binding posts on the speaker end, in theory, unless you are modifying the connections to/thru the crossover, the only benefit would be thicker wire. If the speaker has 2 sets of binding posts, and they give you a choice of paths through the crossover, then some changed response is possible. However, dedicating copper to frequency bands leads to less than optimal use of the copper. At some points in time the base may need a lot of energy from the amp and it cannot make use of the lower resistance that a common thicker wire would provide.
Why do you think Bi-Wiring improves the sound ?
I now know of 3 people that have converted their speakers to be bi-wired but are not bi-amping .
What is your experience or opinion on why bi-wiring without bi-amping might or does sound better ?
I am concidering converting my speakers but I do not want to be fooled by the addition of increased AWG .
What is your experience or opinion on why bi-wiring without bi-amping might or does sound better ?
I am concidering converting my speakers but I do not want to be fooled by the addition of increased AWG .
- ...
- 122 posts total
- 122 posts total