If Audiophiles care about sound, then why so few threads on acoustics


... and so many on cables?

I am sure there are 10 if not 50 times more posts on cables too?

I would hope that as audiophiles we could agree that acoustics are far more important than cables. A cable may (or should) make a fraction of a db change. Acoustics can make several db changes (or more).  A cable may have some impact on clarity or soundstage (and many can rightfully debate that). Acoustics absolutely will have an impact on soundstage.

So what is the reason? 
  • Is it because acoustics are "hard", i.e. you really have to put some thought into it? 
  • Are acoustics not sexy enough? 
  • Is it because they are often unattractive?
  • Is it because they carry much in the way of bragging rights (at least with many audiophiles)?
  • Do they not provide enough "retail therapy"?
  • Most audiophile really don't understand much about acoustics and can't contribute?
  • The difference between those who understand acoustics and those that don't is substantial for people are fearful of wading into discussions?

Interested in people's thoughts. People will drop thousands on a cable, $10K on an amp, or turntable, but I don't see anywhere near that spend on acoustics in most cases.
heaudio123
Heaudio, you are absolutely right. I don't even visit the cable topic. I'd loose whatever hair I had left. Having the ability to measure and graph your acoustic environment is a real eye opener. Bass can easily change 10 db in just a few feet. 99% of a systems sound quality is due to the speakers in combination with the room. 

Identical frequency response can sound completely different if one isn’t paying attention to noise. The biggest gremlin in modern times is plugging direct to a router. And no Cat 7 cables are trash and merely add more noise in. I’ve heard this personally, it can take a system from tons of bass to 0 bass despite the fact an RTA says bass is there. 
Two speakers can sound completely different in the same space. Goldenear vs Zu for instance don’t sound remotely the same even in the near field even. 
Some speakers need ideal conditions while some are so musical, room treatments don’t matter as much. 

"There is only one geoffkait. And he’s got your number."
I see the romance blooming.
Frequency response doesn’t matter as much as timing and phase.
Take any room and play an acoustic guitar... it always sounds like an acoustic guitar.
Why is the market so obsessed with speaker design which butchers the time/phase domain? So when you combine the jacked up timing domain with poor driver / amplifier control due to the crossovers... instruments never sound real. This is because you split the harmonics between drivers which have different timing behavior... this is a major reason nothing sounds real no matter what you do.
I want music to sound live.... room treatments do not alter or change whether the sound coming out of speakers sounds live or not.
Now combine a great speaker that is highly musical with some diffusion panels and proper placement... now we’re talking. Take some traditional 3 ways... I don’t care what you do, you’re always listening to speakers.... not music.




That is totally untrue. Speakers shouldn't be musical, and I have never heard a speaker that would not be better with room treatments .. much much better.

Some speakers need ideal conditions while some are so musical, room treatments don’t matter as much.

See your statement above. Unless you are sitting nearfield, there can be more energy in reflections than directed.... guess what reflected energy does to timing?
Why is the market so obsessed with speaker design which butchers the time/phase domain?

It's a common  misconception that low damping factory, i.e. driver connected directly to the amplifier always results in lower distortion. Often it is worse.
So when you combine the jacked up timing domain with poor driver / amplifier control due to the crossovers... instruments never sound real.