SUT to MM cable? what should i get? cable mis-match

In my opinion a line level preamp with at least 4 inputs is a must have, then we can use various phono stages and SUTs to connect them to the line level preamp where we can switch between 4 inputs. 

SUT or MM phono stage can be very small and to find what's the best we have to try many. 

With 2 turntables and 4 tonesrms i am happy with Pass Aleph L pream with 4 inputs where i can connect all my phonostages (with or without SUTs or Headamps) to switch between 4 tonearms. 

Dear chakster, How many tonearms and cartridges our members
own according to you? ''at least 4 inputs is a must have''? 
Must have for what? 

Inputs on LINE LEVEL PREAMP that can be used for DIGITAL too, not only for analog. I use all 4 for analog only, but i have 2 turntables with 4 tonearms. 

The OP own 3 tonearms, so he could connect each tonearm with separate phono stage (or sut and phono stage) to line level preamp. 

It's not necessary to have a SUT with 3 inputs, it can be 3 different separate devices (SUT, Headamp or Phonostage) connected all together to ONE line level preamp

@nandric - seeing as you are goading me into an answer...

...

My reasons for the ET-100 - which i don't have to justify, but i shall so that my question is in fact answered about cable is as follows:

1. it's not so much comfort as a lack of space getting to the back of my components as space is a problem.
2. In addition to this different cartridges need different impedences.
a. The Whest can be altered on load reasonably easily -
b. the Vendetta is more of a pain and requires a multimeter to do it very accurately along with taking the lid off.
c. With 2 young kids and a demanding job i get the best of 1-2 hours to listen. I don't want to sit their fiddling around every time I want to try and listen through one of my other decks - not my idea of fun - i enjoy listening to the music.
3. If i was to be tied down to one input on an SUT I wouldn't bother and just stick to a single to the phono stages I have - which may still be the best sounding.
4. On the other thread i understood that actually the FR is not that brilliant and in fact the likes of Denon Ortofon and Entre are better options.
As I am trying out - i went for the Entre.
Just because I have put out a question, digested the answers, and followed one route does not make me a luddite. As it happens I don't change components every day and amass components like many people. I am entitled top experiment as well

@lohanimal
Given that nandric appears to have not experienced an Entre ET100, then his opinion is speculation at best.
The Fidelity Research step up transformers I have experienced, including the top non switched ones with their matched FR cartridges, were awful - demolished by vintage Peerless’s and newer Jensens.
If you talk to cartridge designers you will find that they have theoretical preferences on optimum SUT depending on the actual cartridge design. For example I have seen JCarr theorise that specifically a toroidal based SUT would give the best outcome for a specific cartridge. This is based on the type of distortions inherent in toroidal vs other transformers and vice versa.
Transfomer matching to cartridge is much more than gain and impedance and in my view is Russian roulette. There never is one best solution.