Bravo chakster, if your writting is meant as dissertation you get
from you older brother an 10. There are two kinds of contributions
in our forum. Those who use arguments related to the subject-
matter and those who argue against the writer using the old
''strow man'' strategy . They have no argument reg. the subject-
matter but well about assumed character of the writer.
Even in this short thread one can easylly see both kinds as
well difference between them. Some of them even pretend to
speak in the name of the other assuming that the other is not
able to speak for himself. Arrogance is the other name for
stupidity.
from you older brother an 10. There are two kinds of contributions
in our forum. Those who use arguments related to the subject-
matter and those who argue against the writer using the old
''strow man'' strategy . They have no argument reg. the subject-
matter but well about assumed character of the writer.
Even in this short thread one can easylly see both kinds as
well difference between them. Some of them even pretend to
speak in the name of the other assuming that the other is not
able to speak for himself. Arrogance is the other name for
stupidity.