Are Mapleshade recordings the digital equivalent of Direct to Disk recordings?
not really, since they are mastered to tape, then CD’s cut from tape. but Pierre’s process is very pure so is his sound on his CD’s. the result is quite ’like’ direct to disc.
CD’s analagous to ’direct-to-disc’ would be where the recording format is 16/44 and the CD is a direct result without a higher rez step in between.
i have a Starbucks CD called ’Artist Confidential’ that is a collection of acoustic versions of pop songs that was recorded to 16/44 and then a CD made from this. it’s very good and one of the better digital recordings i own.
better yet woutd be owning a higher rez file the same as the source file; like the Reference Recordings HRx’s. they are the source file 176/24 and you can buy that source file. i have many of those.
the lesson learned is to get as close to a native format as you can. but still......the musical performance is still king. great music has to come first, then we hope it sounds good. if the recording process stifles the musical flow then it’s just sound. but mixed into all those direct-to-disc are some magical performances. so the process does allow for more music to come through.