Damping Factor - Interesting article


Benchmark Media published interesting article on Damping Factor.  I already knew that it does not make much difference for the damping of the membrane, but low output impedance is necessary to drive changing impedance ot the speaker (ideal voltage source).  According to this article DF=100 produces about 0.5dB variations typically, while DF=200 reduces it to 0.1dB.  DF above 200 is inaudible.

https://benchmarkmedia.com/blogs/application_notes/audio-myth-damping-factor-isnt-much-of-a-factor?omnisendAttributionID=email_campaign_5eda3b728a48f72deaf34bf2&omnisendContactID=5cf9266b15b61cc5a2a4dee7&utm_campaign=campaign%3A+AUDIO+MYTH+-+%22DAMPING+FACTOR+ISN%27T+MUCH+OF+A+FACTOR%22+%285eda3b728a48f72deaf34bf2%29&utm_medium=email&utm_source=omnisend

128x128kijanki
How does damping factor apply to a zero feedback amp like an ayre .
Generally speaking, the output impedance of a solid state amplifier can be so low with respect to most speakers that it can behave as a voltage source, even if it has no feedback. This is why there are zero feedback class D amps that also behave as a voltage source.


One thing I've noticed a lot while working in high end audio is the phenomena known as 'tight bass'. I regard it as a coloration, since in real life tight bass doesn't seem to exist. The head engineer of Electro-Voice wrote an interesting article that pointed to this many years ago but I've failed to find a link to his article. Essentially though, it points out that no speaker made needs a damping factor more than about 20:1 and many need a damping factor much lower, some as low as 1:10 and you read that right (certain kinds of OB speakers).


The sound difference you hear between systems that have much greater damping factors is often related to distortion rather than FR errors, due to how the brain interprets distortion (if often favors such tonality over actual FR errors or the lack thereof).


Considering there are no speakers flat to 0.5db without equalization, let alone 0.1db, are we certain that a super high DF is going to result in the best on and off axis frequency response?

What is likely to product worse cone breakup, a high DF or a low DF?

According to this article DF=100 produces about 0.5dB variations typically, while DF=200 reduces it to 0.1dB. DF above 200 is inaudible.

What is likely to product worse cone breakup, a high DF or a low DF?
To my understanding, cone breakup has nothing to do with the amplifier.
High damping factor directly into a driver as opposed to electrical dampening, can make high frequency ringing of the cone worse exacerbating some breakup modes. From a high level model, high DF can be like holding the voice coil stiff while the cone flexes. With low DF, the voice coil is not stationary and moves with the flex, and the increased resistance of the lower DF dissipates the energy of the motion. Very high level, almost like adding a resistor to a snubber.

I should clarify, I am not saying a huge improvement, but the low DF will in many cases be better.