How important is a Linear Power Supply Versus a Switcyed one?


I recently purchased a used Sutherland Insight phono stage to replace the built in one in my Plinius8200 MK II integrates amp. I was amazed at the improvement in openness and presence. It comes with a switched power supply but there is an option for a Linear Supply for about 35% of what I paid for the Insight ($350). I have a Van den Hul One Special cartridge (if that matters). Is it worth it?
sokogear
Thanks for all the input.

I spoke with Ron Sutherland and he is the nicest guy. Can't believe he acts as his own distributor and handles inquiries directly.

He said others in the past who did the Insight upgrade were pleased, but he didn't say they were happy they did it and would do it again. He is not a salesman at all and said with or without it, I would be happy, but he knows it it technically better and like some of the posters have said there is some internal noise reduction. The question is, does it sound better to someone with very good, but not Absolute Sound ears.
 
It's an internal board which he said I could do myself, but you have to "jigger a couple things" and blindly thread an LED and it would take an hour (same price if he installs it or not, which was surprising). The second time I would do it would be easier/quicker.... I'm not really looking for a science project. Even though it's only spacers and screws and an LED (no soldering), he said you need to be dexterous.

By the time shipping back and forth is added, it's about $400, almost half of what I paid for the whole phono stage (used). It is a marketing strategy - he charges 25% of list for the linear Power Supply, which seems a bit much compared to the cost difference when manufacturing the LPS board versus the SMP one. I doubt the incremental cost to him is 25% more with the swap. On his 20/20 PS, which is also widely regarded as a great value, he charges $450 for an LPS and it comes in a separate box, so it is easy to compare.Thats a $2200 Phono Stage vs. $1400 for the Insight.

Doesn't matter though - if it is a noticeable improvement, I would do it.

I just don't know....if it was an external box it would be so much easier to compare and return if I wasn't happy.

Does anyone know anybody who has done the upgrade and saw a noticeable difference? I'm of the school that the most important part of the system is the source, so I don't mind spending $$ there.

The amplifiers I use to drive subwoofers are AB and have switching supplies. No transformers. They certainly have no trouble providing a lot of current on demand. For a Phono amp I don't see why not as long as it was well filtered. I'm not sure way the sound would change. If both supplies were well designed it shouldn't. The advantage of the switching supply is efficiency. Maybe it would be a good idea if you run your house on solar panels. 
They say that SMPs introduce noise into the circuit that could impact the sound quality. Sutherland says it's better to have an LPS, but he wasn't acting like it was a really big deal, claims he doesn't like to make minor changes to his personal system but would tell a family member to do it if asked.

I agree with some of the other posts that it would depend on the system as to whether or not I would hear it, and unfortunately, a trial wouldn't be feasible. 

If it was only one or two hundred bucks, I would just do it because it can't hurt (like when I bought better power cables and didn't hear a difference) and I wouldn't be upset about it, but $400 is something more considerable. I guess it all depends on your mentality on spending.

Oh well, I'll think about it....there are certainly bigger issues in the world....maybe if I can get someone reliable to do the install and drop it to $350 and not have to ship the whole unit....
Any power supply introduces noise.  Linear PS is also switching (at max voltage).  The question is how much noise?  They had to have a reason to implement SMPS.  Switchers are usually used for their efficiency when high currents are required or for size when Linear PS takes too much space (wall-warts).  It is neither case so I thought there was a third reason - they can be designed to be extremely quiet, much quieter than Linear PS.  Otherwise why do it?  It is more expensive and more complicated than Linear PS, that has just few very cheap components.   There must be a reason.  Phono stage has RIAA correction that amplifies low frequencies.  It is +20dB@20Hz and likely +12dB@120Hz.  It is likely that it is also sensitive to low frequency power supply noise (120Hz) - common for Linear PS.
Kijank-if SMPS is more expensive, then why is it standard and LPS an extra cost option?