Vinyl / High qual analog tape / High-res digital -- One of these is not like the other

Just received my brand new sealed J. Geils Band Full House live cassette. Digitally remastered. The best of both worlds? Hugely dynamic, low noise and much more analog sounding than CD. The digitally remastered Stones on Virgin and Zeppelin on Atlantic, by Ludwig and Page/Marino respectively, on cassette will raise some eyebrows. 😲 For all you Kind of Blue freaks out there check out the digitally remastered cassette on Columbia.

Dear @roberttdid , friends: The Telarc digital recording LP ( 1979 ) of 1812 Overture states that the recording goes from 6hz and up and I would like to know that in all analog recordings if tape recorders ( R2R ) can takes 6hz bass frequency, if can be recorded there because for digital is no problem down to 0.
Btw, the Soundstream digital recorder used on sevral labels had a 90db of dynamic range unweigthed.

The 1812 recording is really good and not only for its great bass range with a definition, accuracy and rigthness quality no analog recording can touch it but all the score: that Carillon is an EXPERIENCE to listen it as the triangle or the tambourine. Exist a today reissue made it by the FIM label. Both LPs are something to listen as many other Telarcs titles: Carmen, Mahler Titan, Pictures at an exibition and many more and are easy to buy it all.

There is at least one digital recording by Delos title that we have to have: Beethoven Piano Sonatas with the female player Carol Rosenberger in a
Bösendorfer Imperial Concert Grand instrument.|

From Denon PCM I remember Brahms Piano works with a female player: Annerose Schmidt.

I forgot in my last post to mention the digital LPs by M&K, they named Digital Master Series and I own all that are classical MUSIC with the Philharmonia Hungarica.

Now to really appreciate the very high quality levels of digital well recorded LPs we need an accurated ( not analhytical. ), high resoulition and low whole distortions room/system and the best down there are SS electronics especially in the phonolinepreamp unit with active high gain stages( tubes can’t do it. Sorry for this. ). I give you an example in my system of that accuracy levels: the RIAA eq. deviation in my unit was measured 0.012 db, it’s an all analog, fully discrete and four layer boards design, fully balanced input to output and totally dual mono unit. Not even today top Dartzeel or other top designs can outperforms it. No, my system is not at the same level than the Mike one but it’s good enough for my MUSIC needs.

Other issue with digital LP and D2D is that we need a very good cartridge with high self tracking abilities to capture/pick-up not only " all " recorded information but in accurated/non-distorted way ( especially at inner grooves and several high recorded velocities on those LPs. ) and that cartridge must be very well matched to its tonearm.

The LP digital experience is better that what any of you coulñd think, you only need to try it.

Even those digital LPs bougth it second hand ( mint. ) are splendorous. Recomended if you have the adequated room/system because those LPs are achallenge to any room/system.
Other issue is that with many of the D2D LPs the digital ones must be listened at higher SPL that the one we are accustom to.

Regards and enjoy the MUSIC NOT DISTORTIONS,
R.

Dear friends: Any one knows if we can record a 6hz frequency in a any R2R tape recorder?  I know that in the Studer A-820 even at 30ips we can't do it.

Thank’s in advance. Appreciated.

R.

That Telarc 1812 was famous for its sound. Cannons and all of that. At the same time, I heard that performance itself was not that great. For some reason, I have never heard it.

I also think there were two recordings of 1812 on Telarc. One "original" which became famous and then when digital came about one in digital that was to be more impressive except that the report I read preferred the original one. I forgot why. Maybe even snobbery.

Did I mix something up? I am writing from memory.

All in all, is it worth buying Telarc 1812 and which one?

Hi, never mind no R2R can do it. Btw, the 820 has very poor spec performance: at 30ips its frequency response is only from 40hz to 22khz with a swing deviation of 4db. and its noise level is around 73db. The very old digital recorder Soundstream is way way better: there is no contest in between. ATR machines have a littlebetter specs but nothing to " die for ".

I know that as almost always specs can't tell the whole history but a good part of that history. Along that is the eq. need it ( NAB/IEC/CIIR ) like the vinyl RIAA.

Btw, @atmasphere you always say that vinyl frequency response recorded information goes around 50khz ( at least is what I remember you posted in other threads. ), if you please this is a question: from where came LP recorded frequencies over 28khz when tape recorders can't handled? D2D can do it but tape recorded sourced analog LPs?. I know that I have a high ignorance levels in the analog LP recording process and I would like to learn a little about. Thank's and appreciated.

Today ADC/DACs are extremely good even that several audiophiles vote for the analog machines.

Mike was very specific on what is missing through digital, my experiences as the ones from cleeds and other gentlemans are different but I don't own a R2R unit but analog and digital LPs and CDP/analog rig.

Seems to me that objectivity is inclined by digital when subjectivity for audiophiles go a little inclined for analog. Good that exist both alternatives with one of both in full development: the best time is coming for digital technology not only in audio but in several other world items.

Regards and enjoy the MUSIC NOT DISTORTIONS,
R.