Buying a new TT today


So I’m pretty hellbent on buying a new TT today! Or should I be?!?!? 
I started off kind of sour on vinyl several years back when I ignorantly bought a cheap TT that had a built in phono stage.... Talk about a disappointment! And a buzz kill for vinyl!
Anyway a year or so later I bought a Project Carbon Debut and it blew my mind!!!!  The step up in most aspects of the TT, carbon fiber tone arm/heavier plinth/much heavier platter/motor and remote position/better cartridge in a Ortofon m2red, along with the fact the it was now running through my Integrated’s Phono Stage was just such a leap in sound that I never expected, that now I’m looking for yet another leap like that again lol
Anyway, with pocket flush with cash and headed to two hi-fi shops I pause....
In my new price range, $2,000 or so, should I be looking for a new TT? Or a new cartridge for the TT I have ?
thoughts.
264win
@chakster Sorry no idea what you are talking about. Because I asked about upgrading a stock cable that means I’m trying to change everything on this incredible machine?

Guess what? You can’t tweak the hell out of a Rega and that’s what makes it so special unlike other DD and other designs. Its not meant to be upgraded so not sure what threads you are talking about where people are trying to upgrade everything.

Rega isn’t going to put a $300 power cord on their table, they use a basic power cable that they didn’t design and its the law of diminishing returns....but that doesn’t mean its necessarily a complete waste. I was just asking anyway. Jesus. So glad i didn’t go with a Technic or other DD design. They are ugly too.

@aj523

I don’t care about power cord for any turntable (always using stock power cable), there is no sound related to the turntable power cord at all, power cord just transfer required voltage to the TT power supply to rotate the platter. Since all my turntables are Direct Drive with stable rotation I don’t believe in this snake oil power cords, fuses and all that expensive modern BS for turntables to suck money from audiof**ls.

I have never ever upgraded anything in my Direct Drive turntables, even if they are 30 y.o. i use them as it is, but i do care what i’m buying when it comes to vintage turntables (or anything) - it must be like new and perfectly working.

I did not change anything is my Technics SP-10 mkII drive, it was mint condition and after many years of using i sold it as it is (still mint-) to a friend and it’s still properly working without re-capping or anything. Only lubrication of the motor as required by the manufacturer.

I did nothing to my pair of reference DD i am using now (Luxman PD-444) in my system. I made (metal) custom racks for each of them. I did not change feet or whatever like electronics, i have never replaced power cord or anything like that. I do change mats and tonearms because this turntable designed for those who use many tonearms. A reference class turntable (in my opinion) must be reference as it is, no tweaks needed at all.


@chakster Haven’t I read you post about upgrading feet on the Technics turntables?

@big_greg

I’ve mentioned Audio-Technica High-End pneumatic insulator designed for all king of components. The weak part of an old Technics Obsidian Plinth (made in the 70’s) can be solved with AT-616 pneumatic insulator. Same about any other very old plinth from the 20th century.

I also replaced stock feet on my old pair of Technics from the 90’s when isonoe released direct replacement feet.

BUT it is not necessary for a brand new Technics turntables made in 21st century, the stock feet already nice on SL1200GR or G models. And i think any manufacturer today must think about new standards and they have to supply a turntable with very nice stock feet.

I would rather design a dedicated (nice and heavy) rack for each turntable. I made a few already.

Reading Simone Yorke Blog i can see this dude sells his belt-drive turntables with very nice racks, this is the right concept!


I think the upgrade game is more something Linn does. Their upgrades are numerous to the point that the guy who sold me my Rega told me a guy spent $25K on an LP12.


@sokogear

And Linn, yes :))

Chakster: I’ve heard of a couple of the brands you mentioned above in your vast cartridge inventory, and seem to be a cartridge analyst for Absolute Sound, but I was wondering, of the cartridges currently commercially available and in production, what cartridge would you recommend for a Rega P8 (other than Rega’s 2 MC’s) from a value standpoint?

@sokogear One modern LOMC cartridge i bought myself after a long time of searching for it (not willing pay retail price) was Miyajima Kansui, but your tonearm probably is not heavy enough for it.

I’ve heard good things about Hana, and of course there are the usual suspects of Koetsu, Lyra, Clear Audio, Ortofon, Dynavector, etc. I have a Sutherland Insight phono stage with the Linear Power Supply that has 4-5 adjustable load settings from 100 to 47K ohms.Thanks for your advice.


@sokogear

For Koetsu you need super heavy tonearm (just like for Miyajima Kansui). So your Rega tonearm is not good for Low Compliance cartridges.

I really enjoyed Dynavector cartridges, in KARAT series the latest i have is 17DS2 mkII. Looking at Dynavector website now i can see the latest is KARAT 17DX.

Lyra, Clear Audio (just like Dynavector Te-Kaitora model) are all have this long unprotected cantilever and in my opinion this is extremely dangerous (very easy to break) design, i would never buy anything like that for practical reason (the price is very high).

Personally i would never spend over $2k for any modern High-End cartridge, because there are so many stunning performers even under $1k if you will look for vintage MM/MI or even MC. You should really try some decent MM/MI to break this stereotype forever. In fact an MM/MI can be as good as MC or even better.


Thanks Chakster. Sounds like I should probably just send my Van den hul One Special back to the factory for the $5-600 overhaul. They do whatever needs to be done to bring it back to new.

It’s  interesting that you mention cantilever length-that is something VDH talks about extensively in those links I sent out from their Web site. Theirs is extremely short to minimize travel in the rubber base of the cantilever that wears. It makes life between service intervals to 2500-3500 hours instead of normal 1500-2000. They also have a special stylus shaped so it actually goes deeper (like a sharp pencil tip versus a rounder elliptical one) into the groove and produces less residue (called VDH stylus) which also extends the length of service intervals. Koetsu I believe has no rubber base at all (it might be Lyra).

Although it retails for $1850, I was able to get the One Special from a highly respected local dealer who had taken it in as a trade for a higher level VDH cartridge after his customer only used it for a very short time.for $700, the amount VDH gave him for trade in credit to the new $3500 Frog (I beleive).

It is a high output MC with .65 output with 200 ohm recommended impedance and I’ve been very happy with it, and it sounds even better with the Sutherland Insight I mentioned above I recently bought privately.
Please keep up the banter with AJ-it is hilarious.

BTW, I didn’t think Panasonic (Technics) ever went out of business, just stopped making tables for a while. Interesting....
@chakster I'm not into power cord upgrades but I'll call Rega anyway tomorrow. Their stand alone PSU is pretty impressive but I'm sure they will tell me not to waste my money.   Our first agreement and its on wasteful tweaks ! 

Btw, if you have a 30 year old Technics, you might indeed have the Toys rUs version ( that was for Sogogear) ! 
if you have a 30 year old Technics, you might indeed have the Toys rUs version ( that was for Sogogear) !

@aj523

Definitely RUS version because I’m in Russia :)
My SL1210mkII was $350 in 1995 in local Technics/Panasonic shop, and i was 19 (good times).

It’s interesting that you mention cantilever length-that is something VDH talks about extensively in those links I sent out from their Web site. Theirs is extremely short to minimize travel in the rubber base of the cantilever that wears. It makes life between service intervals to 2500-3500 hours instead of normal 1500-2000. They also have a special stylus shaped so it actually goes deeper (like a sharp pencil tip versus a rounder elliptical one) into the groove and produces less residue (called VDH stylus) which also extends the length of service intervals.

@sokogear

The shortest cantilever i ever tried was IKEDA9c III cantilever-less design :) No cantilever at all, maybe you will like it.

Another one is Dynavector KARAT with very short (1.7 mm) Diamond cantilever, here is the interview with its inventor Dr. Tominari (Dynavector Systems). My old Dynavector thread is here.

VdH stylus, Fritz Gyger stylus, and Ortofon Replicant stylus... are nearly the same, the difference is who’s got the patent and unique name for it. Garrott problers displayed them well here.

Stanton/Pickering invented Stereohedron right after Quadrahedron.

But Shibata-San at JVC/Victor who invented and patended Shibata stylus was first.

New Miyajima Kansui has Shibata stylus because Miyajima-San love it.




BTW, I didn’t think Panasonic (Technics) ever went out of business, just stopped making tables for a while. Interesting....

@sokogear
In this thread definitely meant Technics turntables they stopped making for many years, but at that time Panasonic printers and Panasonic electric shavers were available and i bought them (and happy about quality, no upgrades since that time).


Soko, if your phono stage has more than 60 dB gain, consider an AT ART7. Its recently been discontinued but you may be able to pick one up brand new by perusing the internet. I am more or less in the same camp with Chak when it comes to cartridges, although not as dogmatic, but I think the ART7 among modern cartridges is a real exception in terms of both performance and value for money. It’s really terrific. And when it’s been off the market for a long enough period of time, I think even Chakster will recognize its excellence.