A challenge to the "measurement" camp


I’ve watched some of his video and I actually agree on some of what he said,
but he seems too confident on his insistence on measurement. For those
who expound on the merits of blind test and measurement, why not turn
the table upside down?

Why not do a blind test of measurement? That is I will supply all the measurement
you want, can you tell me which is a better product?

For example, if I have a set of cable, and a set of measurement for each
individual cable, can you tell me which is the best cable based on measurement
alone? I will supply all the measurement you want.
After all, that is what you’re after right? Objective result and not subjective
listening test.

Fast forward to 8:15 mark where he keeps ranting about listening test
without measurement.  
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=katmUM-Xelw

By the way, is he getting paid by Belden?  Because he keeps talking about it
and how well it measures.  I've had some BlueJean cables and they can easily
bettered by some decent cables.  
andy2
All you have proven to me is that you are not qualified to "educate".   You have posted some graphs, but shown no evidence you understand what they mean. If anything, you have shown you don't. You certainly haven't shown maturity.



andy2 OP1,204 posts07-08-2020 11:20pm
Until now, you have offered only insults and claims that djones51 is clueless.
That is because after getting a good education from me,

^^^lols. Now Glupson, you’re officially clueless and useless since you can't read 

Glupson, you’re part of the three stooges.
andy2,

"Glupson, you're part of the three stooges."

Well, if I were you, I would be less arrogant in calling people clueless and useless.
^^^You may not be arrogant but still you could be clueless.  Did you read his post?  Has he posted anything useful even especially I gave him a good lesson?  The answer is NO.  

I am still waiting to see how he can look at the data only and determine which is the better cable?  The dude just blowing hot air but I don't think knows what he talking about.
Glupson,

A quick perusal of andy2's posts reveal an unmistakable pattern. If there is something he does not agree with and if the disagreeing poster does not "bow down", he simply insults them and of course, out comes the lols. He doesn't disprove them, he just insults them. Even when evidence is given, he won't admit his error. I appreciate what you are trying to accomplish, but I just don't think the maturity is there.