Anybody want a laugh?

Actually if you use it in the arctic in a vertical orientation with two polar bears looking at it, the sound is phenomenal. 

Do some research and see the changes made. There may even be a video. It looked almost completely random and did not show any evidence of any engineering practice and certainly no testing to see if it worked other than the usual.


Than said, ... I thought I was cranky. I tip my hat :-)

In a double-blind test, it would be much more difficult to determine any improvement with an upgraded network switch with a system that was not optimized. Comparing a network switch is considerably different than comparing another component - such as a power conditioner.

And I’m asserting that no system, at any price, will make that $500 switch a worthwhile purchase. 

Yup, good for a grin at least....toss some meat into the cage and watch the fur fly over fluff...;)

....but my popcorns' gone cold, so ciao'

While the basic exterior armature is built to resist vibration, the structure itself is also designed to “float”, providing even more effective vibration suppression. This airborne structure makes it almost impossible to transfer vibrations, so there is no sound distortion due to vibration.

Hmmmmmmm...Calling Peter Belt. To his credit, many of his ideas agree or not, did not require a financial outlay. Not as witty as Donald Fagen’s notes on the making of Can’t Buy A Thrill But you get the picture.

4. Jeff Baxter had a theory that one of the secretaries at the ABC offices had several sets of interchangeable breasts which she would alternate wearing from day to day. This turned out to be incorrect.