@audiokinesis - I think PAP has a slight advantage in that it requires the consumer to put in a fair amount of their own effort to put the speakers together, and the speakers themselves require a larger than average listening environment, so customers that order these speakers are more likely fairly confident that they will want to keep them.
PAP also probably has lower shipping costs than more conventional speakers of similar size since they are shipped in pieces, and don't have a huge, heavy enclosure (although it's not exactly light).
But I agree, it is an interesting approach.
@larry5729 - I completely agree that consumers are missing out. But I don't think TV advertising is a cost effective solution for manufacturers. As you pointed out, only a very small percentage of homes have even a mid-fi sound system these days. Unless you are appealing to a significant percentage of the viewing audience (with the possible exception of extremely high margin pharmaceuticals), TV advertising just isn't viable.
I did a TV ad for my bike shop for the local audience and ran it during the Tour de France TV coverage on Comcast. This might have been worth doing once since I was trying to raise awareness for a relatively new shop and the Tour de France was a very focused audience, and since it was such a niche audience, ad rates were relatively low. I also had internal staff that created the content. Even so, I couldn't justify doing this twice given the return.
It might be worth it for a large store in a metro area to run a TV commercial, but probably only if they were also advertising more mainstream products (large-screen TVs) and got some financial support from their vendors. I have seen this type of commercial occasionally in my area, and particularly radio ads.
For manufacturers, getting articles in general magazines that are typically read by more affluent readers (Forbes, New Yorker, Architecture Digest, Conde Nast, inflight airline magazines, etc.) probably makes more sense, and I have seen these every once in a while.
It's challenging when you have a fairly niche market. I don't think most consumers have the buying power they once did, and personal music players (ipods, smart phones) have really taken over as the primary mode in which people listen to music (sadly).
Even friends that are blown away after listening to my 2-channel system or watching a movie on my home theater would still not consider making the investment in a decent system. It's just not a priority for most people any longer.
PAP also probably has lower shipping costs than more conventional speakers of similar size since they are shipped in pieces, and don't have a huge, heavy enclosure (although it's not exactly light).
But I agree, it is an interesting approach.
@larry5729 - I completely agree that consumers are missing out. But I don't think TV advertising is a cost effective solution for manufacturers. As you pointed out, only a very small percentage of homes have even a mid-fi sound system these days. Unless you are appealing to a significant percentage of the viewing audience (with the possible exception of extremely high margin pharmaceuticals), TV advertising just isn't viable.
I did a TV ad for my bike shop for the local audience and ran it during the Tour de France TV coverage on Comcast. This might have been worth doing once since I was trying to raise awareness for a relatively new shop and the Tour de France was a very focused audience, and since it was such a niche audience, ad rates were relatively low. I also had internal staff that created the content. Even so, I couldn't justify doing this twice given the return.
It might be worth it for a large store in a metro area to run a TV commercial, but probably only if they were also advertising more mainstream products (large-screen TVs) and got some financial support from their vendors. I have seen this type of commercial occasionally in my area, and particularly radio ads.
For manufacturers, getting articles in general magazines that are typically read by more affluent readers (Forbes, New Yorker, Architecture Digest, Conde Nast, inflight airline magazines, etc.) probably makes more sense, and I have seen these every once in a while.
It's challenging when you have a fairly niche market. I don't think most consumers have the buying power they once did, and personal music players (ipods, smart phones) have really taken over as the primary mode in which people listen to music (sadly).
Even friends that are blown away after listening to my 2-channel system or watching a movie on my home theater would still not consider making the investment in a decent system. It's just not a priority for most people any longer.