Listen to Duke; you have the best brand, you just need a bit of an upgrade and some room tweaking.
Trust us!
Cheers!
Trust us!
Cheers!
speakers for a large room
@Duke I never had the maggies 2 feet away. I tried it today but really did not like it. As it is now, they are back to 5 feet away from the back and 2 ft away from the side. When I cross them to 45 degrees, the 'sweet spot' is broader but the image is blurred. I prefer the proper positioning for now, about 15 degrees toe in so that each panel faces my head. I do not understand how to measure the effects of reflections except for trial and error. So when you talk about reflections from the back wall, this is what I perceive as essential to the imaging. As a quick test, the image stays coherent even as I walk close to the imaginary line connecting the speakers and even walk past it towards the back wall. This tells me that I am hearing the reflections because the speakers are actually behind my head in this position. This 'walk close' test is how I 'measure' the reflection strength and direction. In terms of getting rid of the wall coverings, I never really tried that. I could just gather up the curtains with a tie to expose the wall and windows. Are you using dipoles (electrostatic, maggie, etc)? |
@topjetboy wrote: " @Duke I never had the maggies 2 feet away. I tried it today but really did not like it. As it is now, they are back to 5 feet away from the back and 2 ft away from the side." Well I admire your quest for knowledge in trying 2 feet! Yup, it sucks. Those additional 3 feet (to bring them out to 5 feet) make a huge improvement, because of the additional time delay they impose on the arrival of the backwave. " When I cross them to 45 degrees, the ’sweet spot’ is broader but the image is blurred." Maggies are NOT good candidates for the extreme toe-in that I suggested. Their radiation pattern is generally too wide, and the tonal balance changes at different horizontal angles due to the side-by-side driver configuration. " Are you using dipoles (electrostatic, maggie, etc)? " No, I’m using what might be called an "asymmetric bi-directional" configuration. The first-arrival sound comes from a fairly directional front-firing array, then the reverberant field is augmented by an up-and-back firing array, whose output bounces off at least one wall and then off the ceiling before arriving at the listening area. This long two-bounce path mimics the path length of a dipole speaker pulled at least 5 feet out into the room, but without requiring that much distance. The SPL and spectral balance of the up-and-back firing array is user-adjustable, for adaptation to different room acoustic situations. The Part-Time Audiophile took some good photos at a show last summer. Note the aggressive toe-in, and the up-and-back firing coaxial speaker installed in the speaker stand: https://parttimeaudiophile.com/2019/06/17/new-gear-from-audiokinesis-and-resonessence-labs-t-h-e-sho... Duke |
There’s a pair of Nola KO 2s for sale at Upscale Audio for $7670 ($14,000 retail) that may deliver everything you’re looking for. Like the Maggies it’s a dipole design but with a line array of multiple dynamic midrange and tweeter drivers that helps with scale and dynamics. As a result they play large yet retain a relatively small footprint. Just another option, and best of luck in your search. |