2. digital
  3. 158902-24

CD Transport VS Streamer

I recently purchased, and returned an Audiolab CDT 6000, because compared to my Bluesound Node 2i, the highs were rolled off and the bass wasn’t as strong.  Im comparing 16/44 tracks to a cd.  I figured it was just the Audiolab CDT 6000 so I returned it and bought a Cambridge CXC instead.  Well, it appears that the CXC is doing the same.  
To clarify, I am using the same dac and the same digital coaxial cable.  I am actually unplugging the digital cord from one device and then plugging it into the other.

The high hats and cymbals seem pretty set back and harder to define on the transports vs the bluesound.  The bass isn’t quite as full on the transport either.

I don’t think I would have ever thought that the CDT or the CXC sounded inferior until I switched back to the bluesound and noticed a difference.  The bluesound really puts forth these high frequencies and allows me to really hear high hats and cymbals as well as putting a pleasant sheen on vocals.  The bass is slightly fuller on the bluesound as well.  The sound through the CDT and the CXC is slightly dull.

This is a bit disheartening because I figured that a $600 transport playing hard copies of an album should match if not surpass a $500 streamer / dac playing files from wifi.

Has anyone else experienced this?  Im to the point where I’m questioning if the transport needs to be burned in or if It is possible that streamed files (cd quality, not high res) just actually sound better than cd’s.

My only reason for buying a transport and buying cd’s is because I don’t want to be reliant on an internet connection or my phone, in order to listen to music.  If my internet goes down while in a listening session or if I ever lost my phone for an evening, I’d have no music.  But, and this is a big BUT, I don’t want to spend $600 on a transport and hundreds on CD’s in order to end up with something that sounds inferior to a $500 streamer streaming music.

Any shared experiences with this will be helpful so Thank You ahead of time!

-Bruce

128x128b_limo
b_limo's avatar
b_limo OP
2,288 posts
 
@georgehifi, so what I’m hearing you say is the cxc is a better transport?

I was thinking about the digital coax cable as well.  In my comparison between the node and the cxc I am using the same cable... I’d like to be able to get this sorted out on the cxc and keep it but if I can’t get it to match the bluesound I might return it.  I will let it burn in some more.  I have an upgraded pc coming from Patrick Cullen soon so with that, some burn in time and perhaps a different coax cable maybe I can get those highs to pop.

Do you have any recommendations on a coax cord that will be more revealing?  I am currently using a signal cable silver resolution...
jjss49's avatar
Ag insider logo xs@2x
jjss49
6,612 posts
 
op

just know that the BS node 2i DAC (analog) output is well known to owners of revealing systems to be a very mediocre sounding unit... one that overly smooths and blurs the sound, making it quite innocuous sounding, but lacking in drive, transient clarity, imaging specificity and impact
lowrider57's avatar
lowrider57
5,417 posts
 
Definitely let the CXC burnin non-stop for 2-3 days.
Which Cullen PC did you order? They all need time to burn-in, some more than others. Patrick can tell you about burn-in.

georgehifi's avatar
georgehifi
10,312 posts
 
@georgehifi, so what I’m hearing you say is the cxc is a better transport?
Just from what I mentioned you get for your $, but then I have not A/B them.
I was thinking about the digital coax cable as well.
Any buddies have a good CD player/transport you can listen to on your system? As I said the CXC is a great "budget" transport, as with haggling you can get it in AU for $490aud that's $350USD

Cheers George
dangcaonguyen
206 posts
 
I am using a cheap DVD Sony DVP-999ES as the transport for my Wavelength Audio Cosine DAC. Compared to BlueSound Node2 (not node2i), to the same DAC, the Sony sounds better. My digital cable is Nordost Moonglo.
More to discover