What isolation feet under your amp with great result?


I'm looking for more cleaner, micro inner details. Not tone control or dynamic.
Amp is 82-lb. TIA
nasaman
Would one of you care to stretch one out by explaining just how isolation feet in a solid state amp does anything but part you from your money?
Another assumption that has nothing to do with the vibrations/resonance problem which is a purely mechanical question...

Which parting of money?

Is someone who understand this problem, and want to solve it, must do it by paying necessarily an unwanted sum of money?

I have did it myself for peanuts, not perfectly, but relatively very well, if i judge by listening audible results...

If someone has money he can try to solve it at a more perfect level paying the price for sure he can or estimated necessary...

Then mixing mechanical problem, with possible scamming, with righteous business, stirring this pot, and provocatively accusing all people of being "victims " and being then stupid, or even worst "audiophiles", and honest designers to be possibly scammers, is more than any customer of this thread can ask for...

It is a bit too much to chew for one mouth sorry....Sometimes we must stop spitting....



" As a suspected "naysayer" I am compelled to challenge your assertion "
  Well I can't argue actual length but I was speaking rhetorical length. Thanks for the grin today!
Mahgister I have no doubt you are the master of cheap, I don't know about effective though. I am in awe of your system and await your scientific and analytical documentation of your contributions to the science of sound propagation.
Your sarcasm is yours not mine.... I dont pretend to any new science at all...

I only sugeest and have made it myself that any creative person can, with homemade only and low cost only materials, transform his system, embedding it rightly...We dont make it with "dogmas", but with experiments and listenings experience that ANYBODY can try if he is not discouraged by some self appointed "scientist"  or self appointed "debunkers" to do so...

Your accusation against all attempt to increase the S. Q. except by costly upgrading electronic parts, is a lie or ignorance; i put it on the same desk than scammers... Because you teach newcomers the wrong gospel....You push them to throw their money in upgrade, negating all simple and non orthodox solutions and called that stupid " tweaks" or scams without knowing what you speak about...

But a method is NOT a bunch of tweaks.... I have invented nothing at all, it is very simple to understand that any electronic component to work at his best MUST be mechanically, electrically, and acoustically embed...My only merit is i put it in words more clearer than most.... Thats all....If i was able to say it clearly it is also because i create it for myself.....

You are like the scammers you hate so much who ask big money for ready made solutions (but the majority of audio business is not scam even if sometimes price is too high ) you propose to all no solutions, except changing their electronic parts to better one at great expanse...

Myself i only want to explain what is clear: dont upgrade anything before embedding it rightfully...

Being an audiophile is not only buying tweaks or upgrading, it is mostly creative listening....
Mahlman creates arguments for the sake of arguing mahsiter, he did that with another thread and then at the end said that’s exactly why he had created that thread. If it works for you and you can do it without spending huge money, it’s not anyone else’s business to dissuade you.