Pondering to pull the trigger on an AT VM 760SLC


Hello... I am going to take a second pass in a different forum... My last post was similar, but I have somewhat  fine tuned my note and questions here...

I am wanted to pull the trigger on an AT VM760SLC.  I think my apprehension is just and I'd like to get a bit of feedback. As I have shared...I have a Dual 1219 and a Grado Platinum 1.  I do remember back in the day about 1976 I bought an AT 14 and I was so impressed by the round tones and higher highs.  I want to hear that again...yes I want rounder, sweeter, candy-coated sound...I admit it....while my tinnitus is probably a factor. :)  All those trips to the Los Angeles Forum as a kid.

Is the AT VM760SLC  a substantial step-up from the Grado Platinum 1 in the tonal quality that I seek?  My concern is whether the Dual 1219 TT can really handle this new cartridge...allowing it to perform as it should.  I am also thinking about that all-important 92 degree set-up.  Is that a factor that can be met with the old-school Dual? Would I need shims to compensate?  Or does the 92 degree issue only apply to higher end MC cartridges?  And...lastly...does a platter mat help to calibrate that 92 degree issue and affect set-up overall?

Go ahead...I can take it...  I love my Dual... but, it is from an older age; as are my Yamaha separates - M-70, C-70.

As far as speakers... yeah...I'm the guy with the Cerwin Vega's D8's...bigger rounder tones, that I  like. And  I am thinking that the AT VM760SLC may compensate for the CV's lesser/subdued highs. 

I could do another post about how I was not impressed by the various models of Klipsch speakers heard at Best buy / Magnolia.   Another day...

Please...any input would be helpful...

Thank you.

vinylspin
vinylspin
tablejockey

sorry, I missed the fact it is MI, I saw 'coil' in my quickie look, however it is Elliptical, my main reason to rule it out.

It does illustrate what I found when researching: MI theoretically should have terrific channel separation and channel balance, but, unless you get WAY UP in price, the specs are not so good,

channel separation only 20-24db; channel balance 1.8db; frequency response +/- 2.5db, that's a 5db swing,

It may sound terrific, you and many may love it, I simply would not go with elliptical. 




Yes!!  I knew I was leaving one out...University Stereo.  That was also back in the day when stores could and would be next door to one another.  Anyone familiar with the San Fernando Valley...back in the 70's...a friend of mine and I would take the bus to either a Lankershim / Riverside Drive location in North Hollywood...or one on Sherman Way (near Canoga Ave) where stores sat side by side.  Unbelievable....and fun.

Thank you all for looking into my cartridge issue...while I twist in the wind trying to pull the trigger on the AT VM760SLC.  I think that is how I am gonna go.  I will go to the top of the Audio Technica MM realm and park myself there.

It has been out a few years... I wonder what "newer"  Audio Technica cart will be released.   Besides,  I think that my 50 year old Dual 1219 and its limited capabilities could not handle an MC or an MI cartridge...and all of their "delicate set-up temperaments".   Besides my ancient 1983 Yamaha Separates C-70 and M-70...with the muddy and thick Cerwin Vega D-8's should be limiting factors as well...somewhat.  My tinnitus is a factor too.  

Now I can start to ponder the 92 degree angle and the azimuth stuff. ..along with the factors involved with a platter mat...type and thickness. ..and whether a platter mat really matters.   Let us chuckle.

I will let all know the details of the AT VM760SLC.  It should proved to be interesting.

Thanks again everyone...kind of all to offer opinions...from a vast harbor of knowledge.  I really enjoy the ability to track all of the different opinions that accompany the new  and varied subjects.  

Sincerely,
vinylspin