I read this review about reviewers

well well another complete devolution of a thread on a-gon

What sense it makes to accuse specific people of the past of something that was common place for almost all?

Darwin never denounced his theory on his deathbed. Why would he? He was right. Get off the crazy conspiracy theory websites.

«History of science is science» -Goethe

Science is not truth, it is the pursuit of truth in his own way....

Darwin’s theory is not a matter to believe in, it is a matter to think about....

Facts and theories are two different things. In the scientific method, there is a clear distinction between facts, which can be observed and/or measured, and theories, which are scientists’ explanations and interpretations of the facts.

source - https://www.livescience.com/21491-what-is-a-scientific-theory-definition-of-theory.html

Darwin had a theory, it’s still a theory, even if there are those who consider it fact.

Like the fact that most who have posted on here regarding the article by Simon Price, is that he is incorrect in his assumptions, and needs to reconsider how he conducts business if wants to continue reviewing hifi and make a living solely from it.

After all, aren’t we all here in Agon, when sharing our findings, somewhat all reviewers?