Anti skate question for Rega P8/RB 880 arm


I just replaced my cartridge with the same one I had (Van den hul MC-One Special) and I am getting conflicting advice on the anti skate settings. It is a Rega P8 with RB 880 arm. Rega says tracking force should match anti skating, Van den hul box says 1-25-1.5g tracking force, but only .2-.4 anti skate, and I have a tru-lift automatic arm lifter whose owner told me the anti skate should be 1/2 or less the tracking force on a Rega. That was after the arm was slipping off the lift bar. I moved it to about .75 anti skate. Before that it was set for 1. He was even saying you don't need anti skate.

Please don't tell me to experiment and see how it sounds. It is set for 1.43 g tracking which I don't want to touch. Thanks.
sokogear
sokogear OP

I would like to provide you with a few links that discuss everything you ever wanted to know about skating force. It is an easy read and has some very informative videos along with it. The best information I have ever read on the subject.

https://www.wallyanalog.com/post/skating-anti-skating-the-basics

https://www.wallyanalog.com/post/skating-force-offset-angle-part-1-of-2
Sounds like they are trying to sell some kind of product, but the bottom line is they are closer to what the tru lift guy is saying versus what Rega is saying. Since seeing a gradation of even 10% on the slider is tough, I'll keep it around .3-.4 or so, in line with what Van den Hul recommends.
Long time ago I had bought a DV 17D2 to go on my RB300 arm, I set AS on the Rega’s slider to match the VTF, 1.95g. After probably a year or two too many I started getting balance issues with the system, I found the stylus was twisted off the vertical and the cantilever was no longer pointing where it should, not bent, it’s a diamond one, but not straight ahead either. My next cartridge, another D2, I set AS using the blank track on “The Enjoyment of Stereo” about half way across the disk, on the slider it was nearer to 1 than 2 this time and the cantilever stayed in line for 5+ years with no CD player to share the burden.
lewm nailed it, and it was a pleasure to read too. About the only thing I might add is the L or R channel distortion people hear is anti-skate being off to a gross degree. Its possible to reach a level where much smaller errors become noticeable. What I noticed only became apparent within the last year or so, center image seemed to tend to be just a bit to the right. Recordings don't always put things dead center so it took me a while to be sure. Well if its off to the right, the right channel is on the right side of the groove, maybe a little too much anti-skate? Adjusted it down very slightly and not only did it shift that little bit more to center but the whole stage became even a little bit more holographic.  

So as with everything analog it seems you get anywhere in the ballpark and its great, but you can always do even a little better than that- but only if you're willing to tweak by ear. Because as lewm so clearly explained these things are all very dynamic and ever-changing, so you have to rely on the one thing able to look at the whole picture, and that is no meter or dial it has to be you. 
sokogear

why do you have a TT? Better than CD?

Certainly not unless the fundamentals are done right.

Most of us (I think I can say), over time have had various turntables, various tonearms, various cartridges, 

It is not rocket science, just the needed tools, and careful patience.