What is missing here?


In this months Absolute Sound magazine there is a nice review of an amp that many of us would probably consider based not only on the review but on the topology utilized with the amp. The amp in question is the new Air Tight ATM 300R. This amp utilizes the 300B tube and according to Dick Olsher " The Air tight ATM300-R wowed me with countless hours of listening pleasure. It consistently brought to life the full sonic promise of the 300B". Sounds amazing right??


Except, nowhere ( except in the specs section) does it mention that this amp is limited to 9Watts/Ch!! And at that it is putting out about 10% distortion! So not only is the amp severely limited to which speakers one can match it to, but those speakers had better be ULTRA high efficiency. While most experienced a’philes will expect the extremely severe limitations of this kind of max output, how many casual listeners who read this article will realize the extreme limitations that this amp comes with? Certainly none of that is mentioned in the review, which brings up the question...why not??? How many even somewhat seasoned a’philes have made the mistake of matching a flea powered amp with a less than favorable speaker load? Let’s hear about it....
128x128daveyf
But daveyf, now you have a grievance with the amplifier's designer too? It seems like you're arguing for hand holding for a potentially uninformed consumer. While I agree it may be nice if such education is readily provided by reviewers and HiFi mags in general, I don't feel a reviewer is being negligent if they don't caution the naive buyer on this sort of consideration. You obviously know better. Who do you imagine is the consumer who'd get suckered here? It seems to me the onus is on the buyer, especially with a high dollar niche product such as this. With so much to learn in the world of HiFi, wouldn't it be really dumb and irresponsible to throw that kind of money around without knowing what you're doing or being savvy enough to get  proper guidance (and not necessarily from a review in a mag)? I think reviewers have other objectives.
The buyer of expensive gear should be somewhat educated on the product, not relying on a review, and use due diligence. I cannot find the Absolute Sound review on line, so if anyone can paste it here, I would like to read it. Maybe I might feel some of what davey is talking about, but not likely.
@daj  Please point to where I have stated I have a grievance with the amps designer! Not the case at all. 
@mrdecibel Unfortunately, what a lot of folks rely on to get their education on an audio product is a review of said product in a well recognized audio magazine. Whether this is a smart thing to do or not is debatable, but I think most of us can agree that a lot of hobbyists give a great deal of creed to a rave review. As such, i think the omission I have been discussing is pertinent and problematical. YMMV.

I ALWAYS read the component’s specs, although I knew it was a low powered SET amp.
The specs section is not really where most readers are going to look 


Amazingly, the second post followed immediately after the first. Almost as if, who cares how obviously out of touch this looks, just as long as I can get a dig in. Pathetic.
My solid state pure class A single ended sugden @ 30 watts into 8 ohms (40 into 4 ohms) sounds better than my 90 watt class AB amp, at least to my ears. It sounds effortless and organic as well as dynamic. It’s actually an amazing amplifier whether it be playing at low volumes ( which it does very well with no lack of detail), or at higher volumes. Thus far, I see no draw back from going with less power to get a more pure (subjective) sound. My speakers are only 89/90 DB. Yes, it’s not a tube amp similar to what the OP mentioned, but still a low powered amp driving a moderately sensitive speaker well.