Looking for tonearm inspiration


I just bought a used SME 20/12 turntable that is about 15 years old.  I also had a used 

Dynavector DRT XV-1s rebuilt/are tipped.  Odd as it may seem, there was no tonearm with the turntable.  I have yet to identify what the phono stage, but listening so far suggest a Sutherland Loco (still open to alternatives).  There must be many out there that have had experience with the SME 20/12 turntable and perhaps a few that have had experience with the SME/Dynavector combination.  Can you suggest a tonearm that had some magic for you with either bit of gear?  Wide range of music: Rock, Jazz, Female Vocal and a bit of Opera from time to time.


chilli42
Dear @mijostyn :  "  If a cartridge is properly matched to the tonearm damping is not required. "

I don't know what you are talking about or what mean with properly matched. If you refered to the cartridge/tonearm frequency range resonance in between then you really don't know what you are talking about.

Do you already compared in the same system the Thownshend Excalibur tonearm against other top contemporary tonearm with matched top LOMC cartridge?

"  features a tonearm damping trough filled with silicon fluid which dampens tonearm movement at the headshell.  " 

https://audiotraveler.wordpress.com/tag/townshend/

Differences for the better are not smaller but makes a paramount differences for the best quality performance of any tonearm you listened in your audio life.

Any tonearm develops every kind of distortions during play. Distortions/resonances that comes from the cartridge it self, the tonearm bearing, the tonearm mount support, the TT, the tonearm wand it self, feedback, etc, etc. and we need that any tonearm be very well damped to avoid/put those resonances at minimum to enhance our play MUSIC experiences and be nearer to the recording.

Any don't damped resonances in the tonearm it self will degrade the precious cartridge signal.

I owned and own non-damped tonearm like the FR and tonearms as the SME V and the great MAX 282 where you have the choice to listen engaged silicon damping or not and I owned both tonearms at the same time and I listened to both arms for many time with out that silicon damping because for me the sound was more " alive " when the damping in some ways " dull " a little the listen experiences.

That happened till I understand what I was listened with out damping and what with silicon damping and what I was listening with out damping was only higher distortion levels from here came that " alive " false enjoyment.

I have to say that both arms with out damping are more or less well damped designs because the build materials used into.

With all my respect to any gentleman: it's stupid to listen a silicon damped tonearm with out damping but human beens  like to make stupid things.


Tonearm damping is a necessity like it or not, the point is not what you like or what like your friend the important issue is MUSIC. I left my stupidity to many years ago, every one learn but there are people never learn.

Regards and enjoy the MUSIC NOT DISTORTIONS,
R.
@bob540

07-23-2020 2:31am
You collect tonearms?  And you swap them out to play?  Just curious
Having multiple tables with a stable of arms and carts is all part of the fun. 
Raul, I think everyone understood what I meant except you. We do however agree that Mr Ikeda's designs are lacking in inspiration.
I'm afraid you have not left your stupidity yet. It is very much still with you.
Some additional damping is required. Uberwaltz, can you please get out the grape jelly?

@mijostyn : "  everyone understood what I meant except you. "

then every one is stupid but me, yes but me. Like it or not.

R.
Actually Raul, from the best I can make out you don't like silicon damping troughs in tonearms any more than mijostyn. He was commenting on the fact that you mistook him entirely. Apparently this comment by you regarding this topic was spot on:
I don't know what you are talking about or what mean with properly matched.
but not for the reasons you seem to have imagined when you wrote that.