BEL 1001 MK5 driving Joseph Audio Pulsars


I own the BEL amp and considering the purchase of a used pair of the Plusars.

My concern is the Pulsars 83.5 dB sensitivity as measured in Stereophile.  They do have a benign impedance curve, not dipping below 6 ohms. This to me means a speaker that thirsts after watts as opposed to current. 

The BEL is rated at 50wpc into 8ohm and doubles down into 4 and 2 ohm loads, likely due to a very conservative 8 ohm rating. Easily drives my Esoteric MG10s (87dB sensitive, 6ohm nominal impedance) to very loud levels.

My room size is `12.5 by 14.5 x 8.5 feet.  An asset for speakers of low sensitivity.

I am looking for thoughts regarding the BEL's ability to drive the Pulsars in a modest size room.




mesch
Well after much deliberation I have decided to pass on the counter offer. Think I may wish to go in a different direction with speakers. 
Thanks all for your thoughts.

I became more concerned about the very low sensitivity. I believe a amp as good as my BEL but with higher wattage would be overly expensive for my budget.
@mesch 

3 grand and up is alot of money to spend on speakers... so many very nice sounding ones to choose from esp. if you entertain well cared for used ones

u have not mentioned what kind of music you listen to...  you seem to know what to target in your search but as you know this forum is just full of ideas .... :)
The genre of music makes no difference. If anyone could find a way to make a speaker or electronics favor a certain kind of music they would be a millionaire overnight :)
@mesch

ralph/atmasphere’s comments notwithstanding

i stand by my post

some speakers are definitely better suited to some genres (and usual implied volume levels) than others... in my experience knowing what music you mostly listen to helps tremendously in picking the right speakers

Whether or not any given speaker "favours a certain kind of music", there are certainly examples of speakers that are poor choices for certain kinds. A mini monitor (or the QUAD ESL) for reproducing pipe organ recordings (a Symphony Orchestra performing, say, Berlioz Requiem, such as Colin Davis conducting The LSO. Or Saint-Saens Symphony No. 3 by George Pretre and The Paris Conservatoire Orchestra with Maurice Durufle on organ. Or AC/DC’s Back In Black ;-) played at live listening SPL. Another reason to buy a DBA!

One who listens to predominantly acoustic Folk (or Bluegrass) music may not need the same "kind" of speaker as does one who listens to Death Metal, just as a driver who travels on only highways doesn’t need a car with the same abilities as does the driver who spends time on winding mountain roads. It’s the ol’ sports car vs. tractor scenario. Horses for courses: It’s not only what a speaker can do, but what it can’t. Different musics certainly DO place different demands on loudspeakers, which reward the musics accourding to their strengths and weaknesses (or abilities and inabilities). IMO ;-) .

Yes, a perfect loudspeaker would be able to reproduce all musics equally well. Since there aren’t any, and since different speakers have different imperfections (or inabilities), does it not make sense to choose one whose abilities and inabilities align well the demands the music the listener is most concerned with places on the speaker? You can’t have it all, though the "best" speakers may come closer than more compromised ones.

What abilities are most important to you? What are you willing to give up in order to get something else? I can’t live with a speaker exhibiting ANY vowel colorations (the great term coined, as far as I know, by J. Gordon Holt), And I need a speaker which can reproduce the contrasting timbre of the harpsichord, cello, violin, and flute playing J.S. Bach, revealing the very complex (and changing) root/harmonic overtone structure each instrument produces (speakers vary DRASTICALLY in their abilities to do that). But pinpoint imaging and a great soundstage are not that important to me. To each his own!