@chrismini,
"Vinyl is the best,.."
If one record has persistently eluded all of the best efforts of digital to get close to the original vinyl release, it’s this one.
I’ve heard far too many digital versions and none of them, not even the Sony SBM remaster came close to capturing the warmth and body of the 200 gram Classic Records Reissue.
Apparently it was mastered by Bernie Grundman, and for once with success.
https://www.discogs.com/Miles-Davis-Kind-Of-Blue/release/1800281
The original 1959 ’6 eye’ pressing is almost as good sonically, just a touch less vivid, but certainly not worth the usual asking price.
The Mo-Fi reissue is also highly rated as is the 45rpm 2 disc version of the Classic itself, but I’ve not heard either. To be honest I don’t particularly want to, for me the 209 gram Classic is more than good enough.
Here’s Mike from theingroove.com sharing his knowledge. As a caution he mentions that there are many damaged copies knocking about.
https://youtu.be/rm7l57TfOjY
"Vinyl is the best,.."
If one record has persistently eluded all of the best efforts of digital to get close to the original vinyl release, it’s this one.
I’ve heard far too many digital versions and none of them, not even the Sony SBM remaster came close to capturing the warmth and body of the 200 gram Classic Records Reissue.
Apparently it was mastered by Bernie Grundman, and for once with success.
https://www.discogs.com/Miles-Davis-Kind-Of-Blue/release/1800281
The original 1959 ’6 eye’ pressing is almost as good sonically, just a touch less vivid, but certainly not worth the usual asking price.
The Mo-Fi reissue is also highly rated as is the 45rpm 2 disc version of the Classic itself, but I’ve not heard either. To be honest I don’t particularly want to, for me the 209 gram Classic is more than good enough.
Here’s Mike from theingroove.com sharing his knowledge. As a caution he mentions that there are many damaged copies knocking about.
https://youtu.be/rm7l57TfOjY