So I think some clarification is in order here ...
Before I bought the SF O2’s, I auditioned quite a number of speakers, including high efficiency ones like Klipsch Forte III, Devore O/96, Proac D48R, etc. I also auditioned Harbeth SHL5+, PMC (forgot the actual model), KEF Reference 1 (last year), and a few more. So it’s not that I don’t understand the pros and cons of low sensitivity speakers as @millercarbon seems to be assuming, although his input and guidance is very relevant and generally spot on. But for whatever reason, I never seem to warm up to the sound of high sensitivity speakers; there is something about them that I don’t get along with. Of course, this is a matter of personal preference and I’m sure many of you will disagree. Admittedly, I haven’t heard all the high sensitivity speakers under the sun, so I’m quite sure there are some that I might have liked. But as a general rule of thumb, I don’t buy speakers that I cannot audition. And of all the speakers that I auditioned, the Olympicas and Harbeth SHL5+ (I already own P3ers and love them), connected with me emotionally. In fact, I could have bought the Harbeths and be equally happy.
Having said that, if I had not heard the Olympica’s II driven by more expensive gear, I would have been perfectly fine with the Cronus Magnum II. In fact, I played around with positioning last night and already notice a substantial improvement. I’m also going to contact GIK next week to get some room treatments. So it’s not really a matter of not liking or enjoying the sound, it’s just that now I know that these speakers have much more to give and hence my original post. And I knew exactly what I was getting into when I bought the speakers.