New AT cartridge thoughts/question


After considering purchasing a new TT or just getting a new cart for my old Dual 1219 I decided on the cart.  After some research and a suggestion from a previous thread I went with an AT-VM 95SH from Music Direct.  Got around to installing it today and so far sounds good.  More detail and better imaging, quicker bass, extended treble.  What really stood out was the percussion, especially cymbals, hi-hat, ride.  Unfortunately, I've only had a chance to listen for a short while today and at low volume.  More extended listening to come soon I hope!

My question is about possible cart burn-in.  While the increased detail is great, the treble might be a little too tipped up for me.  Maybe this is just how this cart sounds?  Or can I expect it to mellow out just a bit as I put hours on it?  I am a  relative newb with vinyl (many years off!) and this is my first go at a cartridge change.  Going to put as many hours on this new cart as possible in the coming days so we'll see what happens.  Honestly, still considering a new TT altogether!   
pkatsuleas
~@bkeske, I think he is looking for a mechanism to placate the population. He is in business to sell cartridges. He can not just come out and attack people's sensibilities. Another thing. This is not rocket science. Phonograph cartridges are very simple devises. Electronics engineering and even speaker design are far more complicated subjects.
Peter's experience is in building and repairing cartridges. I would not know were to start in that regard and my hands are too shaky anyway. His designs are borrowed from others with some embellishment.  
I own an Audio Technica ART7 cartridge that I purchased new. At first, I did find it to be lean or clinical sounding, although from the start it was a champ at revealing detail and inner musical voices, as well as having a very articulate bass. Nevertheless, I usually got tired of it after about an hour per listening session. However, after 20-30 hours total, it began to shift in tonal emphasis toward the midrange and upper bass, and these days it is one of my favorite LOMC cartridges. (I own at least 20 cartridges of all types.) Despite the scoffing of MillerCarbon and Mijostyn, I would not attribute this change in my subjective experience of the ART7 solely to psychological adaptation to the sound of the ART7, because at any one time I am alternating among 3-4 different cartridges, running on any of the 5 turntables that are set up to feed two very different audio systems (3 turntables on one system, 2 turntables on the other). I rarely stick to only one combination of tt and cartridge for more than a few consecutive sessions. Thus, I don’t have a fixed mental reference for how music should sound in either of the two systems. The ART7 is not "training" me to hear it in any one particular way. I don’t know what is the mechanism for cartridges changing sound quality from new, but I do believe it happens. Think of it this way: cartridges can wear out for reasons other than stylus wear, so why shouldn’t they also "wear in"? So my advice to you is to give your new AT a little time, and hope for the best.
In re-reading Miller Carbon's post, I see now that his idea is not really different from my experience of the ART7.
I have similar to say about my AT440ML. 

Initially it was just too bright, highly resolving - but also too etched for my longer term listening. 

Now by some 'magic' switching it back in after some quite time of a long hiatus, it sounds just right.
One explanation I do have is, that I had changed in the meantime to an even more resolving XLR IC from preamp to amp, a Madrigal HPC.
Intuitively, this ought to have made things worse, yet it made that previously perceived up-tilt now sound more natural, maybe better integrated...?
Also it is now one of my best sounding cartridges, this even when compared to my Cadenza Black used with SUT! 
M. 🇿🇦