How come there is no thread on the RealityCheck?

Tbg, after how long a period did you wait between zaps? I just re-did an original Nespa'ed CD that I did just over 3 weeks ago, the improvement was very slight, if any, not worth the effort. Still on a new CD the improvement is so great that it still shocks me. I can see why (per the importer) they have been many, many weeks in backorders and have sold hundreds.

I picked sacds that I had done when I originally got the Nespa, aboutt a month ago. I wish I knew why this thing works. It is a lot like the Intelligent Chip in that it works but the explanation is vague at best. I do think it is more effective than the IC, but I still do the IC on the sacds and cd-rs.

Tbg, I have tried the IC and it rarely makes a difference. Sometimes I think it does, then I say no it doesn't. The Nespa ALWAYS makes a BIG differnce, nothing you have to even think about, you just know! The wife hears a differnce, even my kids can hear the differnce (though they don't care). No one else has ever heard an improvement from the IC when I have tried it with friends, they think I've gone off the deep end ...... just my experices.

Leec, I suspect we are differing only on the magnitude of improvement from the IC. Last evening as an after thought I treated a sacd with the IC. It was an improvement, but I do frequently forget to use it.

I now have two more sacds where the second round of Nespaing at 120 sec. did greatly improve the sound. They were last treated probably two weeks ago. I still have not tried the cd-r copies which already had a round of Nespaing after being copied.

Leec, I don't know that anyone else is interested in this, but I have redone three of my cd-rs now. These were Nespaed the first time over one month ago.

First I listened to each and then Nespaed for 60 sec. There was a very great improvement in the bass and soundstaging for each. This causes me concern. Does it mean that the Nespa effect is short term or that I insufficiently Nespaed them originally?