Class D Technology


So I get the obvious strengths of Class D. Efficiency, power output & running cool which allows for small form factors. I also understand the weaknesses somewhat. 1. Non-linear & lots of distortion that needs to be cleaned up with an output filter. 
So my question is, if it weren't for efficiency & power, would there be any reason to own a Class D amp? Do they beat Class A in any other categories that count for sound quality?  
seanheis1
@noble100 

OK- I just wanted to be clear on what was meant by 'switching distortion' since that's not an engineering term at all!

Artifacts from dead time show up as harmonic and intermodulation distortions, so a class D amplifier can easily be compared to other amps on that basis. IOW, on its own 'switching distortion' has no meaning. 


With regards to the switching frequency, with the current state of affairs with switching devices, its actually easier to make a low distortion amplifier when the switching frequency is less than 1MHz. This is because the amplifier has to meet certain standards for RF radiation- various countries have specs for how much RF noise can be tolerated. The faster you go, the difficulty in getting the amp to behave in this regard goes up on an exponential curve! Its quite a feat that Technics was able to switch so fast, but in reading their ads for the amp, I suspect a bit of marketing hype is also involved.


The problem with a low switching frequency is probably that of bandwidth, but class D amps can have a way of getting around that, since it is possible to add enough feedback to allow the amp to compensate for phase shift that would otherwise plague an amplifier with bandwidth from only 20Hz-20KHz.


In a nutshell its really dangerous to make blanket statements about 'all class D amplifiers' just as it is about 'all tube amplifiers' or the like- there are often many exceptions.



Hello atmashere,

     I'm always learning useful and interesting stuff from you.

Thank you,
   Tim
Hello all.  I'm not able to be on here as much as I used to, but I will answer when I can. 
@atmasphere   Hi Ralph,  You are correct, I don't necessarily use engineering terms,  but that may be because I am not an engineer. 
I have posted in the past that As much as I do know and practice about speakers, I've spent my adult life working on, building, modifying and designing speakers,  I found that I was only touching the surface with amplifiers.  I was out of place in some more technical conversations... So I decided to learn.  6 or 7 years ago, I started buying bad amplifiers,  repairing and rebuilding and in general just learning about amplifiers.  I have repaired or rebuilt maybe a dozen old classics and today am fairly competent doing most repairs or modifications on amplifiers. Compared to those builds,  my class D quest has been fairly simple.  I have been purchasing class D modules and doing changes.  With these modules, I built with linear supplies and switching supplies,  both when hefty enough supplies were used would produce quite good results.... I started mostly just upgrading parts on these boards to very high quality parts.  I have done very few circuit mods,  but I have done a couple.   Many of these amps do a good job.  
Bottom line is until we can get rid of the nasty 3rd harmonic distortion in class d our ears will always prefer the cozy 2nd harmonics that tubes generate!😮

I cannot hear any trace of harmonic distortions on the 3rd or any other partials when I play music with my class D Rowland M925 monos or class D Rowland Daemon integrated.... Nor do they intermodulate. They are as sweet and stunning as can be.


As fashionable as it might be, generalization is a dangerous tool. Best to avoid the infimous logical trap of "1, 2, 3.... 99, 100".


Like with any other class of operation, the performance of class D amps can be evaluated only one amp at a time... And only through actual listening to boot. There is a huge variation of audible performance characteristics and tonal qualities amongst amps to make any sweeping proclamations one way or another.


 Regards, Guido