Anyone have experience with the Nanotec Nespa?

Nespa#1 is soooo gooood.
It made me enjoy in CD's which I have not listen to
for a long time because they sounded badly.
Obviously it helps to overcome failure in manufacturing process of CDs.
XRCDs treated with Nespa are equal to the best SACDs.

Leec, I believe you about your tests although I will try them myself, but from my understanding of how the Nespa works or is said to work, I would expect no improvement on a cd-r.

As I understand it the Nespa heats the cd and gets a closer bond between the silver cover and the substrata by removing space between the two occupied by gas. Since the cd-r has no overlay, at least as I understand how they work, I don't see how there could be any benefit. I would have expected a fourth disc where the original was Nespaed and then copied would have been best and that Nespaing the cd-r had no effect.

Since my vinyl is so good and digital is getting equally tedious, maybe I should only listen to vinyl.

Jfz, you should also know that the Nespa everyone is talking about here is the $895 Pro version.

Leec, Thanks for your comparisons; that was helpful. John

Does anyone know what the difference is between a Normal and a Pro Nespa?
More Light/
Shorter Zap time?
and most of all for the numerous CD's that we have differentiating the Nespaing (thanks Lee) treated CD's from zapping them again in the Nespa by mistake and it's effect of it!
Nev