Anyone have experience with the Nanotec Nespa?

OK, this took some time but I made 4 RCCD's: One of the black CDR's was Nespa'd before making the copy, one was never Nespa'd the 3rd was Nespa'd before and after and the 4th Nespa'd only after it was RealityChecked! Got this so far. The best sounding of all was the one that was Nespa'd after it was copied via the RealityCheck process. Nespaing (a new word now) a blank CDR before it was copied, did not have the openess and bass control that a copied RCCD/Nespa CD had. This was not subtle.
Still, as in my previous posts, I'm enjoying just zapping each CD with the Nespa unit and forgoing using the RCCD process, yes it's better doing all but the difference and time it takes is just not worth it, IMHO, yours may differ, or you have a lot of free time.
Enjoy, hope this has helped.

Nespa#1 is soooo gooood.
It made me enjoy in CD's which I have not listen to
for a long time because they sounded badly.
Obviously it helps to overcome failure in manufacturing process of CDs.
XRCDs treated with Nespa are equal to the best SACDs.

Leec, I believe you about your tests although I will try them myself, but from my understanding of how the Nespa works or is said to work, I would expect no improvement on a cd-r.

As I understand it the Nespa heats the cd and gets a closer bond between the silver cover and the substrata by removing space between the two occupied by gas. Since the cd-r has no overlay, at least as I understand how they work, I don't see how there could be any benefit. I would have expected a fourth disc where the original was Nespaed and then copied would have been best and that Nespaing the cd-r had no effect.

Since my vinyl is so good and digital is getting equally tedious, maybe I should only listen to vinyl.

Jfz, you should also know that the Nespa everyone is talking about here is the $895 Pro version.

Leec, Thanks for your comparisons; that was helpful. John