dodgealum Just starting to explore adding a sub to my system and wondering whether Class D is the way to go.
jjss49 class d greatest strength is outstanding bass, so yes on that front
Definitely the way to go, but there is a proviso, so long as the bass (sub) loading is "not too" much below 3-4ohms with high EPDR (-phase angle), "if not so" then Class-D’s high point is it’s bass and it’s claim to fame.
You’ll see that Class-D’s output impedance is measured in milliohms, not in 1/10’s of ohms like Linear amps. So for the same given subwoofer load a Class-D amp has a multitude better "damping factor" (woofer control) than a linear amp can do.
But saying that into a hard bass frequencies "loads" like a Wilson Alexia etc that have of 0.9ohms (EPDR), a linear amp like Gryphons etc etc will wipe the floor with the Class-D in the bass, because the Gryphon etc can do far more current into that 0.9ohm bass speaker load.
So you have a two edged sword for bass, "control" (damping factor) and (current drive), and it all comes down to what the load is that the sub is presenting to the amp, to which will sound the better for the bass, Class-D or Linear (Class-A,A/B)
Then you have to ask, which bass is the better designed, one that's an easy load or one that's a ***** to drive, I generally find the latter to give the better sounding bass when driven right, as they have usually been developed to the max, and the down side is a hard to drive impedance loading for an amp to see.
Cheers George