Anyone listen to Zu Audio's Definition Mk3?


Comparisons with the 1.5s and the others that came before? Getting the itch; again......
128x128warrenh
It's stable...not as stable as 4 spikes on the ground but it's stable. It would take a significant attempt or accident to get it to fall. I had a big "oafy" dog and you nieces around them all the time and never gave it a second thought. Star Sound is not in the business of making stands that cause you to destroy your equipment. Remember that there are coupling discs on between the spikes and the bottoms of your speakers which greatly enhances the contact area and stability. If I thought they were in any way a hazard I would never even mention them for fear I would be partially responsible for destroyed speakers.
I am a very big fan of Starsound and my rig is atop Sistrum stands 'cept my amp. I would put my Def IVs (on the way) on SP 101s in a jiff, but I'm tapped. I replaced my Def 1.5 with Audiopoints. In fact I never used Zu's spikes. The Sp-101s will be a major tweak to look forward to when the time and wife align with the stars. They are a gorgeous looking piece of speaker stand, as well.
Dave,

Did you have your Def 2s on those Sistrums as well? I'm intrigued by what you have to say about them.

In the past I've noticed different footers could really shift tonal balance of the components placed on top of them, did you notice this at all or were they 'neutral' in their effect, so to speak?

Fred
Fred,
The Sistrum's were purchased after the Def 4's so no experience with them and previous models. Chalresidad has a good descriptionof the Sistrum efects and I concur with his statements. The difference is anything but subtle. I haven't noticed any significant tonal balance shift with the Sistrums...Quite an improvement in my system.
D
Schw06, how about some system pics homebrew? That would help people visualize this....