I never mentioned anything about distortion. They did compare the ls50
and the meta and the graph shows the response is pretty much identical.
Its not significant. Its only a couple db at most. You could easily do
that with an EQ and it would cost you far less than buying a meta.
I will stick with my original conclusion that you don't know how to read a response graph for a speaker. The new LS50 Meta is much smoother, There are far fewer evidences of resonances in the new LS50 Meta.
I never mentioned anything about distortion.
That is not something to be proud of. The new LS50 Meta has a very smooth response. One should be quite curious about distortion ... which you did inadvertently mention when you said "noise". That is a guess from your part having never heard it.
I briefly heard the ls50 and they had no bass. Also the sound quality
changed too much when I moved my head up or down. The metas will be no
different in these respects
One would not expect them to have much bass. In the vast majority of listening room, probably >95%, deep bass would be better served by well placed (for bass) subwoofers.
As this graph shows, the LS50 Meta, changes very little over the typically very small vertical listening window most people use:
https://www.stereophile.com/images/1220KEF50fig06.jpg This would be superior to most speakers with the exception of planar arrays and electrostats which can have their own issues. You are clearly making up an issue that does not actually exist. The coaxial tweeter ameliorates response anomalies that can occur from vertical angle change.